Technical Note: Evaluation of the WRF-Chem "Aerosol Chemical to Aerosol Optical Properties" Module using data from the MILAGRO campaign

被引:164
作者
Barnard, J. C. [1 ]
Fast, J. D. [1 ]
Paredes-Miranda, G. [2 ]
Arnott, W. P. [2 ]
Laskin, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
MEXICO-CITY; LIGHT-ABSORPTION; AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS; SPECTRAL ABSORPTION; ORGANIC AEROSOLS; NITROGEN-DIOXIDE; MASS; FIELD; EXTINCTION; PHOTOLYSIS;
D O I
10.5194/acp-10-7325-2010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A comparison between observed aerosol optical properties from the MILAGRO field campaign, which took place in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA) during March 2006, and values simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-Chem) model, reveals large differences. To help identify the source of the discrepancies, data from the MILAGRO campaign are used to evaluate the "aerosol chemical to aerosol optical properties" module implemented in the full chemistry version of the WRF-Chem model. The evaluation uses measurements of aerosol size distributions and chemical properties obtained at the MILAGRO T1 site. These observations are fed to the module, which makes predictions of various aerosol optical properties, including the scattering coefficient, B-scat; the absorption coefficient, B-abs; and the single-scattering albedo, omega(0); all as a function of time. Values simulated by the module are compared with independent measurements obtained from a photoacoustic spectrometer (PAS) at a wavelength of 870 nm. Because of line losses and other factors, only "fine mode" aerosols with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 mu m are considered here. Over a 10-day period, the simulations of hour-by-hour variations of Bscat are not satisfactory, but simulations of B-abs and omega(0) are considerably better. When averaged over the 10-day period, the computed and observed optical properties agree within the uncertainty limits of the measurements and simulations. Specifically, the observed and calculated values are, respectively: (1) Bscat, 34.1+/-5.1Mm(-1) versus 30.4+/-3.4 Mm(-1); (2) Babs, 9.7+/-1.0 Mm(-1) versus 11.7+/-1.2 Mm(-1); and (3) omega(0), 0.78+/-0.05 and 0.74+/-0.03. The discrepancies in values of omega(0) simulated by the full WRF-Chem model thus cannot be attributed to the "aerosol chemistry to optics" module. The discrepancy is more likely due, in part, to poor characterization of emissions near the T1 site, particularly black carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:7325 / 7340
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Integrating nephelometer with a low truncation angle and an extended calibration scheme [J].
Abu-Rahmah, A. ;
Arnott, W. P. ;
Moosmuller, H. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 17 (07) :1723-1732
[2]   ABSORPTION OF VISIBLE RADIATION IN ATMOSPHERE CONTAINING MIXTURES OF ABSORBING AND NON-ABSORBING PARTICLES [J].
ACKERMAN, TP ;
TOON, OB .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1981, 20 (20) :3661-3668
[3]   Internally mixed soot, sulfates, and organic matter in aerosol particles from Mexico City [J].
Adachi, K. ;
Buseck, P. R. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (21) :6469-6481
[4]   Fractal parameters of individual soot particles determined using electron tomography: Implications for optical properties [J].
Adachi, Kouji ;
Chung, Serena H. ;
Friedrich, Heiner ;
Buseck, Peter R. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D14)
[5]   O/C and OM/OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry [J].
Aiken, Allison C. ;
Decarlo, Peter F. ;
Kroll, Jesse H. ;
Worsnop, Douglas R. ;
Huffman, J. Alex ;
Docherty, Kenneth S. ;
Ulbrich, Ingrid M. ;
Mohr, Claudia ;
Kimmel, Joel R. ;
Sueper, Donna ;
Sun, Yele ;
Zhang, Qi ;
Trimborn, Achim ;
Northway, Megan ;
Ziemann, Paul J. ;
Canagaratna, Manjula R. ;
Onasch, Timothy B. ;
Alfarra, M. Rami ;
Prevot, Andre S. H. ;
Dommen, Josef ;
Duplissy, Jonathan ;
Metzger, Axel ;
Baltensperger, Urs ;
Jimenez, Jose L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (12) :4478-4485
[6]   Nitrogen dioxide and kerosene-flame soot calibration of photoacoustic instruments for measurement of light absorption by aerosols [J].
Arnott, WP ;
Moosmüller, H ;
Walker, JW .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2000, 71 (12) :4545-4552
[7]  
Arnott WP, 1999, ATMOS ENVIRON, V33, P2845
[8]   Estimation of the mass absorption cross section of the organic carbon component of aerosols in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area [J].
Barnard, J. C. ;
Volkamer, R. ;
Kassianov, E. I. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (22) :6665-6679
[9]   An evaluation of the FAST-J photolysis algorithm for predicting nitrogen dioxide photolysis rates under clear and cloudy sky conditions [J].
Barnard, JC ;
Chapman, EG ;
Fast, JD ;
Schmelzer, JR ;
Slusser, JR ;
Shetter, RE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (21) :3393-3403
[10]   Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling [J].
Bates, T. S. ;
Anderson, T. L. ;
Baynard, T. ;
Bond, T. ;
Boucher, O. ;
Carmichael, G. ;
Clarke, A. ;
Erlick, C. ;
Guo, H. ;
Horowitz, L. ;
Howell, S. ;
Kulkarni, S. ;
Maring, H. ;
McComiskey, A. ;
Middlebrook, A. ;
Noone, K. ;
O'Dowd, C. D. ;
Ogren, J. ;
Penner, J. ;
Quinn, P. K. ;
Ravishankara, A. R. ;
Savoie, D. L. ;
Schwartz, S. E. ;
Shinozuka, Y. ;
Tang, Y. ;
Weber, R. J. ;
Wu, Y. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 :1657-1732