The False-positive to False-negative Ratio in Epidemiologic Studies

被引:236
作者
Ioannidis, John P. A. [1 ]
Tarone, Robert [2 ]
McLaughlin, Joseph K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Int Epidemiol Inst, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI; CANDIDATE GENES; METAANALYSIS; REPLICATION; VARIANTS; HERITABILITY; DISEASES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821b506e
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The ratio of false-positive to false-negative findings (FP:FN ratio) is an informative metric that warrants further evaluation. The FP:FN ratio varies greatly across different epidemiologic areas. In genetic epidemiology, it has varied from very high values (possibly even > 100:1) for associations reported in candidate-gene studies to very low values (1:100 or lower) for associations with genome-wide significance. The substantial reduction over time in the FP:FN ratio in human genome epidemiology has corresponded to the routine adoption of stringent inferential criteria and comprehensive, agnostic reporting of all analyses. Most traditional fields of epidemiologic research more closely follow the practices of past candidate gene epidemiology, and thus have high FP:FN ratios. Further, FP and FN results do not necessarily entail the same consequences, and their relative importance may vary in different settings. This ultimately has implications for what is the acceptable FP:FN ratio and for how the results of published epidemiologic studies should be presented and interpreted.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 456
页数:7
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations
[2]   Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: A study of astrological signs and health [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad M. ;
Juurlink, David N. ;
Hux, Janet E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (09) :964-969
[3]   What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers [J].
Bartlett, C ;
Sterne, J ;
Egger, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7355) :81-84
[4]   Epidemiology, Public Health, and the Rhetoric of False Positives [J].
Blair, Aaron ;
Saracci, Rodolfo ;
Vineis, Paolo ;
Cocco, Pierluigi ;
Forastiere, Francesco ;
Grandjean, Philippe ;
Kogevinas, Manolis ;
Kriebel, David ;
McMichael, Anthony ;
Pearce, Neil ;
Porta, Miquel ;
Samet, Jonathan ;
Sandler, Dale P. ;
Costantini, Adele Seniori ;
Vainio, Harri .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 117 (12) :1809-1813
[5]   False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: A plea for epistemological modesty [J].
Boffetta, Paolo ;
McLaughlin, Joseph K. ;
La Vecchia, Carlo ;
Tarone, Robert E. ;
Lipworth, Loren ;
Blot, William J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (14) :988-995
[6]  
BOSKER FJ, MOL PSYCHIA IN PRESS
[7]   Genome-Wide and Candidate Gene Association Study of Cigarette Smoking Behaviors [J].
Caporaso, Neil ;
Gu, Fangyi ;
Chatterjee, Nilanjan ;
Jin Sheng-Chih ;
Yu, Kai ;
Yeager, Meredith ;
Chen, Constance ;
Jacobs, Kevin ;
Wheeler, William ;
Landi, Maria Teresa ;
Ziegler, Regina G. ;
Hunter, David J. ;
Chanock, Stephen ;
Hankinson, Susan ;
Kraft, Peter ;
Bergen, Andrew W. .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (02)
[8]   High marks for GWAS [J].
Chanock, Stephen .
NATURE GENETICS, 2009, 41 (07) :765-766
[9]   Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes [J].
Colhoun, HM ;
McKeigue, PM ;
Smith, GD .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9360) :865-872
[10]   When should potentially false research findings be considered acceptable? [J].
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Hozo, Iztok .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (02) :211-217