Preconception gender selection: a threat to the natural sex ratio?

被引:16
作者
Dahl, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Appl Philosphy & Publ Eth, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
gender preferences; sex selection; social surveys;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62218-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This brief paper summarizes a series of postal investigations on the acceptance of selection for X or Y spermatozoa. These were conducted mainly in Germany but also in the UK, the Netherlands and the US. Selected families were approached with a series of questions about their wish to use sperm selection, and their choice of boys or girls. In general, large majorities opposed this approach for family balancing or sex selection on the basis of cost and inconvenience of the treatment. The view was expressed that its use in medicine was more acceptable. Care was taken to compose a series of open questions to particular sections of the population, e.g. men versus women, differing ages, and families with imbalanced sex ratios. More favourable responses arose,for example in pregnant women. Overall, all four nations had large majorities against the use of sex selection.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 118
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SEX SEL OPT REG REP
[2]  
BEIER H, 2003, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V6, P91
[3]   Ethics, legal, social, counselling - Attitudes towards preconception sex selection: a representative survey from Germany [J].
Dahl, E ;
Hinsch, KD ;
Brosig, B ;
Beutel, M .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 9 (06) :600-603
[4]   The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection [J].
Dahl, E .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (03) :266-267
[5]   Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from Germany [J].
Dahl, E ;
Beutel, M ;
Brosig, B ;
Hinsch, KD .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) :2231-2234
[6]  
HARRIS J, 2003, INDEPENDENT 1127, P19
[7]   Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty' [J].
Pennings, G .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (03) :268-269
[8]   Gender variety as a valid choice: a comment on the HFEA - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty' [J].
Robertson, JA .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (03) :270-271
[9]   An attempted suppression of liberty [J].
Schulman, JD .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (04) :374-375