Species identification in meat products using real-time PCR

被引:84
作者
Jonker, K. M. [1 ]
Tilburg, J. J. H. C. [1 ]
Hagele, G. H. [1 ]
De Boer, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Food & Consumer Prod Safety Author, Zutphen, Netherlands
来源
FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT | 2008年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
real-time polymerase chain reaction (PGR); DNA hybridization; species identification; TaqMan;
D O I
10.1080/02652030701584041
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
One of the most convenient methods for the identification of animal species in processed meat products is the examination of DNA sequences. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) techniques are particularly suitable because even small fragments of DNA formed during heat processing of the meat can be amplified and identified. A real-time PCR method has been developed and evaluated for the identification of processed meat products. In test mixtures containing beef, pork, horse, mutton, chicken and turkey, it was possible to identify these species down to a level of 0.05%. By adjusting the number of cycles, it was possible to detect levels as low as 0.01% of these species. Cross-re activity between these species was not found, except for pure horsemeat (250 ng DNA) in the assay for turkey meat. Cross-reactivity of deer, roe, ostrich, kangaroo, goat, domestic duck, mallard, goose, pigeon, guinea fowl, quail and pheasant was also investigated and it was found that amounts as high as 250 ng DNA of these species in the reaction vial did not result in (false) positive signals except for amounts higher than 125 ng deer DNA and higher than 50 ng pigeon DNA in the determination of chicken and beef, respectively. More than 150 meat samples were examined using DNA hybridization and real-time PCR. A comparison of the results showed a better performance of the real-time procedure compared to DNA hybridization.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 533
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION OF HEATED MEAT-PRODUCTS BY DNA HYBRIDIZATION
    EBBEHOJ, KF
    THOMSEN, PD
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 1991, 30 (03) : 221 - 234
  • [2] Farouk AE, 2006, SAUDI MED J, V27, P1397
  • [3] Meat species identification by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene
    Girish, PS
    Anjaneyulu, ASR
    Viswas, KN
    Shivakumar, BM
    Anand, M
    Patel, M
    Sharma, B
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2005, 70 (01) : 107 - 112
  • [4] Effect of heat and pressure processing on DNA fragmentation and implications for the detection of meat using a real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Hird, H
    Chisholm, J
    Sanchez, A
    Hernandez, M
    Goodier, R
    Schneede, K
    Boltz, C
    Popping, B
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS, 2006, 23 (07): : 645 - 650
  • [5] Development of a monoclonal antibody specific to cooked mammalian meats
    Hsieh, YHP
    Sheu, SC
    Bridgman, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1998, 61 (04) : 476 - 481
  • [6] Species identification in meat by using PCR-generated satellite probes
    Janssen, FW
    Hägele, GH
    Buntjer, JB
    Lenstra, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1998, 21 (03) : 115 - 120
  • [7] DNA-based methods for food authentication
    Lockley, AK
    Bardsley, RG
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 11 (02) : 67 - 77
  • [8] THE WET WEIGHT AND THE CONCENTRATION OF DNA, RNA AND PROTEIN IN DIFFERENT TISSUES OF PIGS OF VARIOUS AGE
    MARX, D
    KOLB, E
    SALOMON, FV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES A-ZENTRALBLATT FUR VETERINARMEDIZIN REIHE A-PHYSIOLOGY PATHOLOGY CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1992, 39 (01): : 11 - 25
  • [9] Evaluation of a DNA fingerprinting method for determining the species origin of meats
    Partis, L
    Croan, D
    Guo, Z
    Clark, R
    Coldham, T
    Murby, J
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2000, 54 (04) : 369 - 376
  • [10] Identification of animal species in ground meat mixtures by multivariate analysis of isoelectric focusing protein profiles
    Skarpeid, HJ
    Kvaal, K
    Hildrum, KI
    [J]. ELECTROPHORESIS, 1998, 19 (18) : 3103 - 3109