Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News

被引：173

作者：

Metzger, Miriam J. ^{[1
]}

Hartsell, Ethan H. ^{[1
]}

Flanagin, Andrew J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Commun, SSMS Bldg, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA

来源：

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH | 2020年 / 47卷 / 01期

关键词：

selective exposure; cognitive dissonance; credibility; news; bias; MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM; MEDIA; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; ATTITUDE; PREFERENCE; INTERNET; COMMUNICATION; CONSISTENT; SEEKING;

D O I：

10.1177/0093650215613136

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

Selective exposure research indicates that news consumers tend to seek out attitude-consistent information and avoid attitude-challenging information. This study examines online news credibility and cognitive dissonance as theoretical explanations for partisan selective exposure behavior. After viewing an attitudinally consistent, challenging, or politically balanced online news source, cognitive dissonance, credibility perceptions, and likelihood of selective exposure were measured. Results showed that people judge attitude-consistent and neutral news sources as more credible than attitude-challenging news sources, and although people experience slightly more cognitive dissonance when exposed to attitude-challenging news sources, overall dissonance levels were quite low. These results refute the cognitive dissonance explanation for selective exposure and suggest a new explanation that is based on credibility perceptions rather than psychological discomfort with attitude-challenging information.

引用

页码：3 / 28

页数：26

共 71 条

[21] Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information [J].

Ditto, PH ;

Scepansky, JA ;

Munro, GD ;

Apanovitch, AM ;

Lockhart, LK .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (01) :53-69

[22] MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM - USE OF DIFFERENTIAL DECISION CRITERIA FOR PREFERRED AND NONPREFERRED CONCLUSIONS [J].

DITTO, PH ;

LOPEZ, DF .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :568-584

[23]

Donsbach W., 2009, MEDIA CHOICE THEORET, P128, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203938652

[24] ON THE MOTIVATIONAL NATURE OF COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE - DISSONANCE AS PSYCHOLOGICAL DISCOMFORT [J].

ELLIOT, AJ ;

DEVINE, PG .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (03) :382-394

[25] Assessing Selective Exposure in Experiments: The Implications of Different Methodological Choices [J].

Feldman, Lauren ;

Stroud, Natalie Jomini ;

Bimber, Bruce ;

Wojcieszak, Magdalena .

COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2013, 7 (3-4) :172-194

[26] Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits [J].

Fischer, P ;

Jonas, E ;

Frey, D ;

Schulz-Hardt, S .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 35 (04) :469-492

[27] Selective exposure and information quantity: How different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information [J].

Fischer, Peter ;

Schulz-Hardt, Stefan ;

Frey, Dieter .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 94 (02) :231-244

[28] A New Look at Selective-Exposure Effects: An Integrative Model [J].

Fischer, Peter ;

Greitemeyer, Tobias .

CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 19 (06) :384-389

[29] Perceptions of Internet information credibility [J].

Flanagin, AJ ;

Metzger, MJ .

JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2000, 77 (03) :515-540

[30] Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate [J].

Garrett, R. Kelly .

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2009, 59 (04) :676-699

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →