Tomato quality evaluation using electronic nose systems to complement sensory analysis

被引:2
作者
Berna, A [1 ]
Lammertyn, J [1 ]
Saevels, S [1 ]
Nicolaï, B [1 ]
De Poortere, S [1 ]
Buysens, S [1 ]
Grün, IU [1 ]
Di Natale, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Flanders Ctr, Lab Postharvest Technol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL POSTHARVEST SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-3 | 2005年 / 682期
关键词
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill; principal component analysis; generalized procrustes analysis;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.682.133
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 [园艺学];
摘要
This paper compares and relates electronic nose systems and sensory analysis for tomato aroma evaluation. Eight tomato cultivars were selected and assessed on days 4, 7 and 14 after harvest. They were harvested at the red-ripe stage of maturity. Descriptive sensory analysis was performed by seven trained panellists. For instrumental analysis a quartz microbalance electronic nose (QMBE-nose) and a mass spectrometry based electronic nose (MSE-nose) were used. Initially, principal component analysis was performed separately on the instrumental and sensory data sets to explore the structure of each data set. Sensors and signals of the QMBE-nose and MSE-nose, respectively, were then further studied to investigate their relation with the sensory profile of tomato cultivars, using generalized procrustes analysis. The results show the potential of both electronic nose systems to complement routine sensory analysis of tomatoes.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1028
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2007, 8589 UNI EN ISO
[2]
QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF FLAVOR PARAMETERS IN 6 FLORIDA TOMATO CULTIVARS (LYCOPERSICON-ESCULENTUM MILL) [J].
BALDWIN, EA ;
NISPEROSCARRIEDO, MO ;
BAKER, R ;
SCOTT, JW .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1991, 39 (06) :1135-1140
[3]
Electronic nose systems to study shelf life and cultivar effect on tomato aroma profile [J].
Berna, AZ ;
Lammertyn, J ;
Saevels, S ;
Di Natale, C ;
Nicolaï, BM .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2004, 97 (2-3) :324-333
[4]
FRESH TOMATO AROMA VOLATILES - A QUANTITATIVE STUDY [J].
BUTTERY, RG ;
TERANISHI, R ;
LING, LC .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1987, 35 (04) :540-544
[5]
Krumbein A, 1998, NAHRUNG, V42, P395, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(199812)42:06<395::AID-FOOD395>3.0.CO
[6]
2-7
[7]
Marsili R, 2002, FOOD SCI, V115, P349
[8]
McGorrin R.J., 2001, AROMA ACTIVE COMPOUN, P73
[9]
Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples [J].
Saevels, S ;
Lammertyn, J ;
Berna, AZ ;
Veraverbeke, EA ;
Di Natale, C ;
Nicolai, BM .
POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 30 (01) :3-14
[10]
USDA, 1975, COL CLASS REQ TOM VI