Methodological and statistical issues of quality of life (QoL) and economic evaluation in cancer clinical trials: Report of a workshop

被引:40
作者
Neymark, N
Kiebert, W
Torfs, K
Davies, L
Fayers, P
Hillner, B
Gelber, R
Guyatt, G
Kind, P
Machin, D
Nord, E
Osoba, D
Revicki, D
Schulman, K
Simpson, K
机构
[1] Eortc Data Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Medtap Int, London, England
[3] Janssen Res Fdn, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium
[4] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[5] MRC, Canc Trials Off, Cambridge, England
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Div Gen Internal Med, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[7] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Div Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[9] Royal Victoria Hosp, Div Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[10] MRC, Canc Trials Off, Cambridge, England
[11] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[12] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[13] Medtap Int, Bethesda, MD USA
[14] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[15] Chiron Diagnost, Emeryville, CA USA
关键词
cancer; quality of life; economic evaluation; costs;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00074-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In recent years, quality of life (QoL) and economic evaluations have become increasingly important as additional outcome measures in cancer clinical trials. However, both fields of research are relatively new and in need of finding solutions to a substantial number of specific methodological problems. This paper reports on the proceedings of a symposium aimed at summarising and discussing some of the most contentious methodological and statistical issues in QoL and economic evaluations. In addition, possible solutions are indicated and the most pertinent areas of research are identified. Issues specific to QoL evaluations that are addressed include clinically meaningful changes in QoL scores; how to analyse QoL data and to handle missing and censored data and integration of length of life and QoL outcomes. Issues specific to economic evaluations are the advantages and disadvantages of various outcome measures; statistical methods to analyse economic data and choice of decision criteria and analytical perspective. How to perform QoL and economic evaluations in large and simple trials and whether the gap between QoL and utility measures can be bridged are also discussed. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1333
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   INDIRECT COSTS IN ECONOMIC-STUDIES - CONFRONTING THE CONFUSION [J].
KOOPMANSCHAP, MA ;
RUTTEN, FFH .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1993, 4 (06) :446-454
[12]  
LUCE BR, 1992, METHODS COST EFFECTI
[13]   Economic evaluation techniques in healthcare - Reinventing the wheel? [J].
Maynard, A .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1997, 11 (02) :115-118
[14]  
OBRIEN B, 1994, MED CARE, V132, P150
[15]  
RITTENHOUSE B, 1995, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V11, P265
[16]   THE RELEVANCE OF SEARCHING FOR EFFECTS UNDER A CLINICAL-TRIAL LAMPPOST - A KEY ISSUE [J].
RITTENHOUSE, BE .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (04) :348-357
[17]  
RITTENHOUSE BE, 1996, QUALITY LIFE PHARMAC, P1215
[18]   STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF COST OUTCOMES IN A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
RUTTENVANMOLKEN, MPMH ;
VANDOORSLAER, EKA ;
VANVLIET, RCJA .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1994, 3 (05) :333-345
[19]   DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF INDEXES OF HEALTH - GENERAL METHODS AND A SUMMARY OF RESULTS [J].
SACKETT, DL ;
CHAMBERS, LW ;
MACPHERSON, AS ;
PSYCH, D ;
GOLDSMITH, CH ;
MCAULEY, RG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1977, 67 (05) :423-428
[20]   Statistical methods for cost-effectiveness analyses [J].
Siegel, C ;
Laska, E ;
Meisner, M .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (05) :387-406