Bias correction with a single null marker for population stratification in candidate gene association studies

被引:20
作者
Wang, YT
Localio, R
Rebbeck, TR
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
population stratification; association study; bias; confounding;
D O I
10.1159/000085940
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Population stratification is a form of confounding by ethnicity that may cause bias to effect estimates and inflate test statistics in genetic association studies. Unlinked genetic markers have been used to adjust for test statistics, but their use in correcting biased effect estimates has not been addressed. We evaluated the potential of bias correction that could be achieved by a single null marker ( M) in studies involving one candidate gene ( G). When the distribution of M varied greatly across ethnicities, controlling for M in a logistic regression model substantially reduced biases on odds ratio estimates. When M had same distributions as G across ethnicities, biases were further reduced or eliminated by subtracting the regression coefficient of M from the coefficient of G in the model, which was fitted either with or without a multiplicative interaction term between M and G. Correction of bias due to population stratification depended specifically on the distributions of G and M, the difference between baseline disease risks across ethnicities, and whether G had an effect on disease risk or not. Our results suggested that marker choice and the specific treatment of that marker in analysis greatly influenced bias correction. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 175
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The power of genomic control [J].
Bacanu, SA ;
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 66 (06) :1933-1944
[2]   Association studies for quantitative traits in structured populations [J].
Bacanu, SA ;
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 22 (01) :78-93
[3]   Population stratification and spurious allelic association [J].
Cardon, LR ;
Palmer, LJ .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9357) :598-604
[4]   Genomic control for association studies [J].
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (04) :997-1004
[5]   Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies [J].
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K ;
Wasserman, L .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 60 (03) :155-166
[6]   Unbiased methods for population-based association studies [J].
Devlin, B ;
Roeder, K ;
Bacanu, SA .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (04) :273-284
[7]  
GAIL MH, 1984, BIOMETRIKA, V71, P431
[8]   Association studies of genetic polymorphisms and complex disease [J].
Gambaro, G ;
Anglani, F ;
D'Angelo, A .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9200) :308-311
[9]   Matching strategies for genetic association studies in structured populations [J].
Hinds, DA ;
Stokowski, RP ;
Patil, N ;
Konvicka, K ;
Kershenobich, D ;
Cox, DR ;
Ballinger, DG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2004, 74 (02) :317-325
[10]   Control of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations [J].
Hoggart, CJ ;
Parra, EJ ;
Shriver, MD ;
Bonilla, C ;
Kittles, RA ;
Clayton, DG ;
McKeigue, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (06) :1492-1504