Bias correction with a single null marker for population stratification in candidate gene association studies

被引:20
作者
Wang, YT
Localio, R
Rebbeck, TR
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
population stratification; association study; bias; confounding;
D O I
10.1159/000085940
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Population stratification is a form of confounding by ethnicity that may cause bias to effect estimates and inflate test statistics in genetic association studies. Unlinked genetic markers have been used to adjust for test statistics, but their use in correcting biased effect estimates has not been addressed. We evaluated the potential of bias correction that could be achieved by a single null marker ( M) in studies involving one candidate gene ( G). When the distribution of M varied greatly across ethnicities, controlling for M in a logistic regression model substantially reduced biases on odds ratio estimates. When M had same distributions as G across ethnicities, biases were further reduced or eliminated by subtracting the regression coefficient of M from the coefficient of G in the model, which was fitted either with or without a multiplicative interaction term between M and G. Correction of bias due to population stratification depended specifically on the distributions of G and M, the difference between baseline disease risks across ethnicities, and whether G had an effect on disease risk or not. Our results suggested that marker choice and the specific treatment of that marker in analysis greatly influenced bias correction. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 175
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Population stratification in the candidate gene study: Fatal threat or red herring? [J].
Hutchison, KE ;
Stallings, M ;
McGeary, J ;
Bryan, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (01) :66-79
[12]  
Khlat M, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P1660
[13]   The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases: An epidemiologic perspective [J].
Khoury, MJ ;
Yang, QH .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (03) :350-354
[14]   Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies [J].
Lin, DY ;
Psaty, BM ;
Kronmal, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (03) :948-963
[15]  
MASAYUKI D, 2001, J JAPAN STAT SOC, V31, P53
[16]   Power and efficiency of the TDT and case-control design for association scans [J].
McGinnis, R ;
Shifman, S ;
Darvasi, A .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2002, 32 (02) :135-144
[17]   CONFOUNDING - ESSENCE AND DETECTION [J].
MIETTINEN, OS ;
COOK, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1981, 114 (04) :593-603
[18]   Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance [J].
Morton, NE ;
Collins, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (19) :11389-11393
[19]   Association mapping in structured populations [J].
Pritchard, JK ;
Stephens, M ;
Rosenberg, NA ;
Donnelly, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 67 (01) :170-181
[20]   Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies [J].
Pritchard, JK ;
Rosenberg, NA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 65 (01) :220-228