Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners

被引:451
作者
Atman, Cynthia J.
Adams, Robin S.
Cardella, Monica E.
Turns, Jennifer
Mosborg, Susan
Saleem, Jason
机构
[1] Univ Washington, CELT, Dept Ind Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Engn Educ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Advancement Scholarship Engn Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Tech Commun, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Coll Educ, LIFE Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Roudebush VAMC, VAHSR&D Ctr Implementing Evidence Based Practice, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
design expertise; design process; problem scoping;
D O I
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this paper we report on an in-depth study of engineering design processes. Specifically, we extend our previous research on engineering student design processes to compare the design behavior of students and expert engineers. Nineteen experts from a variety of engineering disciplines and industries each designed a playground in a lab setting, and gave verbal reports of their thoughts during the design task. Measures of their design processes and solution quality were compared to pre-existing data from 26 freshmen and 24 seniors. The experts spent significantly more time on the task overall. and in each stage of engineering design, including significantly more time problem scoping. The experts also gathered significantly more information covering more categories. Results support the argument that problem scoping and information gathering are major differences between advanced engineers and students, and important competencies for engineering students to develop. Timeline representations of the expert designers' processes illustrate characteristic distinctions we found and may help students gain insights into their own design processes.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 379
页数:21
相关论文
共 86 条
[21]  
Bailey R, 2006, INT J ENG EDUC, V22, P508
[22]  
Ball L. J., 1997, Thinking & Reasoning, V3, P247, DOI 10.1080/135467897394284
[23]   COGNITIVE-PROCESSES IN ENGINEERING DESIGN - A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY [J].
BALL, LJ ;
EVANS, JST ;
DENNIS, I .
ERGONOMICS, 1994, 37 (11) :1753-1786
[24]   STRUCTURED AND OPPORTUNISTIC PROCESSING IN DESIGN - A CRITICAL DISCUSSION [J].
BALL, LJ ;
ORMEROD, TC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 1995, 43 (01) :131-151
[25]  
Brereton Margot F., 1996, ANAL DESIGN ACTIVITY, P319
[26]  
BROCKMAN JB, 1995, DESIGN STUDIES, V16, P211
[27]  
Bursic KM., 1998, QUALITY MANAGEMENT J, V5, P60, DOI DOI 10.1080/10686967.1998.11919148
[28]  
CARDELLA M, 2007, DESIGN ENG ED FLAT W
[29]   Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers [J].
Cardella, ME ;
Atman, CJ ;
Adams, RS .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2006, 27 (01) :5-24
[30]  
Chi MTH, 2006, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF EXPERTISE AND EXPERT PERFORMANCE, P21