Citizen engagement processes as information systems: the role of knowledge and the concept of translation quality

被引:40
作者
Horlick-Jones, Tom
Rowe, Gene
Walls, John
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Sch Social Sci, Cardiff CF10 3WT, Wales
[2] Inst Food Res, Norwich NR4 7UA, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0963662506074792
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
An important direction in recent thinking about public understanding of science and technology is embodied in the international trend within many democratic countries towards the promotion of citizen engagement. These developments entail the participation and deliberative involvement by lay publics in planning, decision-making and policy-making situations. In this paper we argue that citizen engagement exercises can usefully be understood as information systems. This characterization leads us to propose that the effectiveness by which such exercises utilize sources of knowledge-what we term their translation quality-should be adopted as a new criterion for their evaluation. We illustrate the applicability of this proposal by analyzing the GM Nation? public debate, a govemment-sponsored citizen engagement exercise that took place in Britain in 2002-3.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 278
页数:20
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Linell P., 1998, Text, V18, P143
[32]  
Manning P., 1988, SYMBOLIC COMMUNICATI
[33]  
Markle GE., 1995, HDB SCI TECHNOLOGY S, P361, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412990127
[34]  
MARRIS C, 2001, CT873844 FAIR EUR CO
[35]  
*NAT RES COUNC, 1996, UND RISK INF DEC DEM
[36]  
*OECD, 2001, PUMA POL BRIEF
[37]   The public-expert interface in local waste management decisions: expertise, credibility and process [J].
Petts, J .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 1997, 6 (04) :359-381
[38]  
Petts J., 2001, SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION
[39]   Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision making: The case of the 2003 British GM nation? Public debate [J].
Pidgeon, NF ;
Poortinga, W ;
Rowe, G ;
Jones, TH ;
Walls, J ;
O'Riordan, T .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (02) :467-479