Ultimatum bargaining behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia, and the United States: A social utility analysis

被引:32
作者
Costa-Gomes, M [2 ]
Zauner, KG
机构
[1] Univ York, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[3] Univ Vienna, Dept Business Studies, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1006/game.2000.0805
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We explain the main Features of the results of the four-country ultimatum bargaining experiments of Roth et al. (1991), Amer. Econom. Rev. 81, 1068-1095) by a social utility model. The specification of social utility of a player has two parts: a linear combination of the monetary payoffs of the proposer and the responder and payoff uncertainty. We find that, on average, responders have negative regard for proposers' earnings in all countries. Proposers have negative regard fur responders' monetary earnings in countries where responders have high negative regard for proposers' earnings (USA and Slovenia). In countries where responders have: low negative regard for proposers' earnings (Israel and Japan), proposers are expected payoff maximizers. Classification Numbers: A13, C19, C44, C72, C92, D63, D64. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 269
页数:32
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A theoretical analysis of altruism and decision error in public goods games [J].
Anderson, SP ;
Goeree, JK ;
Holt, CA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1998, 70 (02) :297-323
[2]  
[Anonymous], REV ECON DYNAM
[3]   ONE-SIDED CONFIDENCE CONTOURS FOR PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS [J].
BIRNBAUM, ZW ;
TINGEY, FH .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1951, 22 (04) :592-596
[4]  
BOLTON GE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1096
[5]   ANONYMITY VERSUS PUNISHMENT IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING [J].
BOLTON, GE ;
ZWICK, R .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :95-121
[6]   The ultimatum game: Optimal strategies without fairness [J].
Burnell, SJ ;
Evans, L ;
Yao, ST .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1999, 26 (02) :221-252
[7]   ULTIMATUMS, DICTATORS AND MANNERS [J].
CAMERER, C ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :209-219
[8]   Progress in behavioral game theory [J].
Camerer, CF .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (04) :167-188
[9]  
Crawford V.P., 1997, Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, P206
[10]   FAIRNESS IN SIMPLE BARGAINING EXPERIMENTS [J].
FORSYTHE, R ;
HOROWITZ, JL ;
SAVIN, NE ;
SEFTON, M .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1994, 6 (03) :347-369