Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England

被引:121
作者
Luisetti, Tiziana [1 ]
Turner, R. Kerry [1 ]
Bateman, Ian J. [1 ]
Morse-Jones, Sian [1 ]
Adams, Christopher
Fonseca, Leila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm CSERGE, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Biol & Chem Sci, London E1 4NS, England
关键词
FUTURE; CLASSIFICATION; ECONOMICS; SUPPORT; VALUES; CARBON; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.11.003
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The recognition of the economic value of nature and the services it provides to humanity has become increasingly essential in the context of coastal zone management. In this paper we review the progress to date on both the necessary conceptual framework and empirical valuation studies required to bolster decision support systems (DSS) targeted at integrated coastal zone management goals. We highlight the importance of using an ecosystem services approach and recommend some basic sequential, although overlapping, analytical steps for appropriate environmental valuation and policy assessment: spatial explicitness; marginal changes; double counting; non-linearities; and threshold effects. We illustrate the practical use of the DSS by reviewing an existing UK case study on managed coastal realignment along the Eastern coast of England, and a new UK case study on managed realignment implemented in a southern area on the same coast. Comparing the two studies, the importance of spatial explicitness and the need for a sequential decision support system when dealing with ecosystem services valuation and project policy appraisal become particularly evident. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 224
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Adams C. A., 2008, THESIS U E ANGLIA NO
  • [2] Andrews JE, 2000, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V166, P145, DOI 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.166.01.09
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, Climate Change 1995-Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, THESIS QUEEN MARY U
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1997, NATURES SERVICES
  • [6] [Anonymous], GREEN BOOK APPR EV C
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2002, VALUING ENV NATURAL
  • [8] Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature
    Balmford, A
    Bruner, A
    Cooper, P
    Costanza, R
    Farber, S
    Green, RE
    Jenkins, M
    Jefferiss, P
    Jessamy, V
    Madden, J
    Munro, K
    Myers, N
    Naeem, S
    Paavola, J
    Rayment, M
    Rosendo, S
    Roughgarden, J
    Trumper, K
    Turner, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 950 - 953
  • [9] Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Koch, Evamaria W.
    Silliman, Brian R.
    Hacker, Sally D.
    Wolanski, Eric
    Primavera, Jurgenne
    Granek, Elise F.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Aswani, Shankar
    Cramer, Lori A.
    Stoms, David M.
    Kennedy, Chris J.
    Bael, David
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Perillo, Gerardo M. E.
    Reed, Denise J.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5861) : 321 - 323
  • [10] The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Day, Brett H.
    Georgiou, Stavros
    Lake, Iain
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) : 450 - 460