Review of major clinical trials with mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

被引:40
作者
Ciancio, G
Miller, J
Gonwa, TA
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Leonard M Miller Sch Med,Lillian Jean Kaplan Rena, Miami, FL 33101 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Jacksonville, Div Transplant Med, Dept Transplantat, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
immunosuppression; mycophenolate mofetil; rejection; renal transplantation;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000187035.22298.ba
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was approved for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation based on the results of three groundbreaking, large, clinical trials that demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of acute rejection in patients receiving MMF when compared with those receiving placebo or azathioprine. These three multi-center, prospective, double-blind trials performed at 55 transplant centers on three continents were the largest immunosuppressive drug trials ever attempted and the first prospective, randomized, double-blind trials ever performed in transplantation. These pivotal trials established a foundation for Widespread acceptance of MW in combination with cyclosporine and steroids as a maintenance regimen for renal transplant patients. The Findings of these initial trials that led to the approval of MMF for renal transplantation, including long-term follow-up data, Will be reviewed in this paper. The expanding scope of major trials of MMF, including trials in pediatric patients, combination regimens with novel induction therapies or other maintenance agents, and trials in special patient Populations Such as those at high immunological risk or With deteriorating kidney function, will also be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:S191 / S200
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [21] Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study
    Dudley, C
    Pohanka, E
    Riad, H
    Dedochova, J
    Wijngaard, P
    Sutter, C
    Silva, HT
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (04) : 466 - 475
  • [22] Kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitor drugs: A prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus versus cyclosporin
    Flechner, SM
    Goldfarb, D
    Modlin, C
    Feng, JY
    Krishnamurthi, V
    Mastroianni, B
    Savas, K
    Cook, DJ
    Novick, AC
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (08) : 1070 - 1076
  • [23] De novo kidney transplantation without use of calcineurin inhibitors preserves renal structure and function at two years
    Flechner, SM
    Kurian, SM
    Solez, K
    Cook, DJ
    Burke, JT
    Rollin, H
    Hammond, JA
    Whisenant, T
    Lanigan, CM
    Head, SR
    Salomon, DR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) : 1776 - 1785
  • [24] *FUJ HEALTHC INC, 2005, PROGR PRESCR INF
  • [25] OKT3 1ST-DOSE REACTION - ASSOCIATION WITH T-CELL SUBSETS AND CYTOKINE RELEASE
    GASTON, RS
    DEIERHOI, MH
    PATTERSON, T
    PRASTHOFER, E
    JULIAN, BA
    BARBER, WH
    LASKOW, DA
    DIETHELM, AG
    CURTIS, JJ
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 39 (01) : 141 - 148
  • [26] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: Results at 6 months
    Gonwa, T
    Mendez, R
    Yang, HC
    Weinstein, S
    Jensik, S
    Steinberg, S
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) : 1213 - 1220
  • [27] Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetill after cadaveric kidney transplantation: Results at three years.
    Gonwa, T
    Johnson, C
    Ahsan, N
    Alfrey, EJ
    Halloran, P
    Stegall, M
    Hardy, M
    Metzger, R
    Shield, C
    Rocher, L
    Scandling, J
    Sorensen, J
    Mulloy, L
    Light, J
    Corwin, C
    Danovitch, G
    Wachs, M
    VanVeldhuisen, P
    Leonhardt, M
    Fitzsimmons, WE
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (12) : 2048 - 2053
  • [28] GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
  • [29] Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients - A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection
    Halloran, P
    Mathew, T
    Tomlanovich, S
    Groth, C
    Hooftman, L
    Barker, C
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [30] Johnson C, 2000, TRANSPLANTATION, V69, P834