Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland

被引:25
作者
Schwenkglenks, M. [1 ]
Lippuner, K.
机构
[1] Univ Basel, European Ctr Pharmaceut Med, ECPM Res, Univ Hosp,ECPM Execut Off, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Bern, Osteoporosis Policlin, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
alendronate; bone densitometry; cost-utility analysis; modelling studies; osteoporosis; switzerland;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-007-0390-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A simulation model adopting a health system perspective showed population-based screening with DXA, followed by alendronate treatment of persons with osteoporosis, or with anamnestic fracture and osteopenia, to be cost-effective in Swiss postmenopausal women from age 70, but not in men. Introduction We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a population-based screen-and-treat strategy for osteoporosis (DXA followed by alendronate treatment if osteoporotic, or osteopenic in the presence of fracture), compared to no intervention, from the perspective of the Swiss health care system. Methods A published Markov model assessed by first-order Monte Carlo simulation was refined to reflect the diagnostic process and treatment effects. Women and men entered the model at age 50. Main screening ages were 65, 75, and 85 years. Age at bone densitometry was flexible for persons fracturing before the main screening age. Realistic assumptions were made with respect to persistence with intended 5 years of alendronate treatment. The main outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results In women, costs per QALY were Swiss francs (CHF) 71,000, CHF 35,000, and CHF 28,000 for the main screening ages of 65, 75, and 85 years. The threshold of CHF 50,000 per QALY was reached between main screening ages 65 and 75 years. Population-based screening was not cost-effective in men. Conclusion Population-based DXA screening, followed by alendronate treatment in the presence of osteoporosis, or of fracture and osteopenia, is a cost-effective option in Swiss postmenopausal women after age 70.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1491
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
[11]   The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized controlled [J].
Clowes, JA ;
Peel, NFA ;
Eastell, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2004, 89 (03) :1117-1123
[12]   INCIDENCE OF CLINICALLY DIAGNOSED VERTEBRAL FRACTURES - A POPULATION-BASED STUDY IN ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, 1985-1989 [J].
COOPER, C ;
ATKINSON, EJ ;
OFALLON, WM ;
MELTON, LJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1992, 7 (02) :221-227
[13]   Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women [J].
Cranney, A ;
Wells, G ;
Willan, A ;
Griffith, L ;
Zytaruk, N ;
Robinson, V ;
Black, D ;
Adachi, J ;
Shea, B ;
Tugwell, P ;
Guyatt, G .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2002, 23 (04) :508-516
[14]   Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures - Results from the fracture intervention trial [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Black, DM ;
Thompson, DE ;
Applegate, WB ;
Barrett-Connor, E ;
Musliner, TA ;
Palermo, L ;
Prineas, R ;
Rubin, SM ;
Scott, JC ;
Vogt, T ;
Wallace, R ;
Yates, AJ ;
LaCroix, AZ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (24) :2077-2082
[15]   Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Melton, LJ .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9319) :1761-1767
[16]   Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis [J].
Devlin, N ;
Parkin, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (05) :437-452
[17]   Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making:: How are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge? [J].
Eichler, HG ;
Kong, SX ;
Gerth, WC ;
Mavros, P ;
Jönsson, B .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (05) :518-528
[18]   Osteoporosis case finding in the general practice:: phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry with and without risk factors for osteoporosis to select postmenopausal women eligible for lumbar spine and hip densitometry [J].
Gasser, KM ;
Mueller, C ;
Zwahlen, M ;
Kaufmann, M ;
Fuchs, G ;
Perrelet, R ;
Abetel, G ;
Bürgi, U ;
Lippuner, K .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (11) :1353-1362
[19]   Cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments for women with osteoporosis in Canada [J].
Goeree, Ron ;
Blackhouse, Gord ;
Adachi, Jonathan .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (07) :1425-1436
[20]   Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures: A prospective study [J].
Graafmans, WC ;
Ooms, ME ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Bouter, LM ;
Lips, P .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (06) :427-431