Exercise behavior, valuation, and the incentive effects of employee stock options

被引:104
作者
Bettis, JC
Bizjak, JM
Lemmon, ML
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Finance, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
executive compensation; option exercises; employee stock options; corporate governance;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We use a large database on ESO exercises to document characteristics of exercise behavior and calibrate a utility-based model for measuring how differences in exercise behavior are manifested in option values and incentives. Option values and incentives computed from the model calibrations are compared to those computed from models used to value tradable options. Our analysis provides guidance to both academics and practitioners about how differences in exercise behavior and model choice affect measures of ESO values and incentives, and underscores the importance of gaining a thorough understanding of the underlying economic forces that affect the behavior of ESO holders. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 470
页数:26
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]   Information distribution within firms: evidence from stock option exercises [J].
Huddart, S ;
Lang, M .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2003, 34 (1-3) :3-31
[22]   EMPLOYEE STOCK-OPTIONS [J].
HUDDART, S .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1994, 18 (02) :207-231
[23]   How to value employee stock options [J].
Hull, J ;
White, A .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2004, 60 (01) :114-119
[24]   PORTFOLIO CONSIDERATIONS IN VALUING EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION [J].
LAMBERT, RA ;
LARCKER, DF ;
VERRECCHIA, RE .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (01) :129-149
[25]  
LEWELLEN K, 2003, FINANCING DECISIONS
[26]   OPTIMUM CONSUMPTION AND PORTFOLIO RULES IN A CONTINUOUS-TIME MODEL [J].
MERTON, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1971, 3 (04) :373-413
[27]   DO CORPORATIONS AWARD CEO STOCK-OPTIONS EFFECTIVELY [J].
YERMACK, D .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 39 (2-3) :237-269