The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: An attentional blink study

被引:35
作者
Jiang, YH
Chun, MM
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Vis Res Ctr, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.664
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Both spatial and temporal selection require focused attention. The authors examine how temporal attention affects spatial selection. In a dual-task rapid serial visual presentation paradigm, temporal selection of a target (TI) impairs processing of a second target (T2) that follows TI within 500 Ins, This process is the attentional blink (AB). To test the effects of withdrawing temporal attention, the authors measured concurrent distractor interference on T2 when the distractors were presented during and outside of the AB. Perceptual interference was manipulated by the similarity in color between T2 and concurrent distractors, and response interference was manipulated by the flanker congruency task. Results showed that perceptual interference was larger during the AB. Response interference also increased during the AB, but only when perceptual interference was high. The authors conclude that temporal selection and spatial selection rely on a common attentional process.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 679
页数:16
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]  
Kahneman D., 1984, Varieties of attention, P29
[32]   PERCEPTUAL LOAD AS A MAJOR DETERMINANT OF THE LOCUS OF SELECTION IN VISUAL-ATTENTION [J].
LAVIE, N ;
TSAL, Y .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 56 (02) :183-197
[33]  
Lavie N, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P175
[34]   PERCEPTUAL LOAD AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR SELECTIVE ATTENTION [J].
LAVIE, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :451-468
[35]   2 STUDIES OF VISUAL SEARCH FOR WORD TARGETS WITH CONTROLLED RATES OF PRESENTATION [J].
LAWRENCE, DH .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1971, 10 (02) :85-&
[36]   Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention [J].
Luck, SJ ;
Girelli, M ;
McDermott, MT ;
Ford, MA .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 33 (01) :64-87
[37]   Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink [J].
Luck, SJ ;
Vogel, EK ;
Shapiro, KL .
NATURE, 1996, 383 (6601) :616-618
[38]   Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? [J].
Maki, WS ;
Frigen, K ;
Paulson, K .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1997, 23 (04) :1014-1034
[39]   Neural correlates of the attentional blink [J].
Marois, R ;
Chun, MM ;
Gore, JC .
NEURON, 2000, 28 (01) :299-308
[40]   THE FLANKER COMPATIBILITY EFFECT AS A FUNCTION OF VISUAL ANGLE, ATTENTIONAL FOCUS, VISUAL TRANSIENTS, AND PERCEPTUAL LOAD - A SEARCH FOR BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS [J].
MILLER, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 49 (03) :270-288