Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years

被引:142
作者
Mistry, Hema [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Econ Unit, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
RETINOPATHY; SERVICES; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1258/jtt.2011.110505
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
A systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare was undertaken from 1 990 until September 2010. Twelve databases were searched, using economic evaluation terms combined with telemedicine terms. The search identified 80 studies which were classed as full economic evaluations; the majority (38) were cost-consequence analyses. There were 15 cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) and seven cost-utility analyses (CUA). In the period January 2004 to September 2010 there were 47 studies. Eleven were CEA and seven were CUA. Economic tools are being increasingly used for telemedicine and telecare studies, although better reporting of the methodologies and findings of the economic evaluations is required. Nonetheless, the results of the review were consistent with previous findings, i.e. there is no further conclusive evidence that telemedicine and telecare interventions are cost-effective compared to conventional health care.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
[Anonymous], GUID METH TECHN APPR
[2]
Economic evaluation of interactive teledermatology compared with conventional care [J].
Armstrong, April W. ;
Dorer, David J. ;
Lugn, Nancy E. ;
Kvedar, Joseph C. .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2007, 13 (02) :91-99
[3]
Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature [J].
Bergmo T.S. .
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 7 (1)
[4]
Telemedicine services for two islands in the Bay of Naples [J].
Bracale, M ;
Cesarelli, M ;
Bifulco, P .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2002, 8 (01) :5-10
[5]
Cost-effectiveness of digital photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity in the United Kingdom [J].
Castillo-Riquelme, MC ;
Lord, J ;
Moseley, MJ ;
Fielder, AR ;
Haines, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (02) :201-213
[6]
Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies [J].
Chiou, CF ;
Hay, JW ;
Wallace, JF ;
Bloom, BS ;
Neumann, PJ ;
Sullivan, SD ;
Yu, HT ;
Keeler, EB ;
Henning, JM ;
Ofman, JJ .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (01) :32-44
[7]
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ [J].
Drummond, MF ;
Jefferson, TO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7052) :275-283
[8]
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
[9]
Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria [J].
Evers, S ;
Goossens, M ;
de Vet, H ;
van Tulder, M ;
Ament, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (02) :240-245
[10]
Hailey D, 2002, J TELEMED TELECARE, V8, P1