Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option?

被引:127
作者
Cense, HA
Rutgers, EJT
Cardozo, ML
Van Lanschot, JJB
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Isala Clin Locat Weezenladen, Dept Surg, Zwolle, Netherlands
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2001年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词
breast cancer; nipple involvement; reconstruction;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.2001.1130
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In women with breast cancer for whom breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is not the best option, a nipple and areola complex-(NAC) sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction has been proposed as a good and safe alternative to conventional, more radical mastectomy. Surgeons hesitate to perform this operation for fear of recurrence of tumour in the NAC due to undetected nipple involvement (NI) of the tumour. In order to determine whether a NAC-sparing mastectomy is a viable option, the frequency and predictive factors of NI by the tumour were studied in the literature. Methods: A literature survey was performed by searching the Medline database. Other references were derived from the material perused. Results and Conclusions: NI is found in up to 58% of mastectomy specimens and correlates with tumour size, tumour-areola or tumour-nipple distance, positive lymph nodes and clinical suspicion. Best candidates for NAC-sparing mastectomy are patients with a small tumour (TI) at a large distance (>4-5 cm) from the nipple. However, in these patients BCT has excellent results with low complications and recurrence rates. Considering the incidence of NI in larger tumours (T2 average 33%, T3 average > 50%) a NAC-sparing mastectomy may carry an unacceptable high risk for local relapse and should therefore not be advocated. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 526
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
[2]   Subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 26 (02) :137-141
[3]   SPREAD TO THE NIPPLE AND AREOLA IN CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST [J].
ANDERSEN, JA ;
PALLESEN, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1979, 189 (03) :367-372
[4]   INVOLVEMENT OF THE NIPPLE AND AREOLA IN BREAST-CANCER - VALUE OF CLINICAL FINDINGS [J].
ANDERSEN, JA ;
GRAM, JB ;
PALLESEN, RM .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1981, 15 (01) :39-42
[5]  
[Anonymous], ANATOMIE PHYSL PATHO
[6]   Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: Patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Le, MG ;
Rochard, F ;
Contesso, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) :1558-1564
[7]  
BISHOP CCR, 1990, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V72, P87
[8]   Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ [J].
Cheung, KL ;
Blamey, RW ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Elston, CW ;
Ellis, IO .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 23 (04) :343-347
[9]   Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography [J].
Davis, PL ;
Staiger, MJ ;
Harris, KB ;
Ganott, MA ;
Klementaviciene, J ;
McCarthy, KS ;
Tobon, H .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 37 (01) :1-9
[10]  
ELDAR S, 1984, AM J SURG, V148, P692, DOI 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90352-0