Ice properties of single-layer stratocumulus during the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 2. Model results

被引:146
作者
Fridlind, A. M. [1 ]
Ackerman, A. S. [1 ]
McFarquhar, G. [2 ]
Zhang, G. [2 ]
Poellot, M. R. [3 ]
DeMott, P. J. [4 ]
Prenni, A. J. [4 ]
Heymsfield, A. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Atmospher Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ N Dakota, Dept Atmospher Sci, Grand Forks, ND 58201 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[5] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JD008646
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Measurements from the US Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program's 2004 Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) provide a unique opportunity to study poorly understood ice formation processes in mixed-phase stratocumulus. Using meteorological, aerosol, and ice nucleus measurements to initialize large-eddy simulations with size-resolved microphysics, we compare predicted liquid and ice mass, number, and size distribution with observations from a typical flight. We find that ambient ice nuclei appear insufficient by a few orders of magnitude to explain observed ice, consistent with past literature. We also find that two processes previously hypothesized to explain the discrepancy, shatter of freezing drops and fragmentation during ice-ice collisions, were not significant sources of ice based on parameterizations from existing studies. After surveying other mechanisms that have been hypothesized to explain ice formation in mixed-phase clouds generally, we find two that may be strong enough: ( 1) formation of ice nuclei from drop evaporation residuals, a process suggested by sparse and limited measurements to date, and ( 2) drop freezing during evaporation, a process suggested only by inference at this time. The first mechanism can better explain the persistence of mixed-phase conditions in simulations of less vigorous stratus observed during the Beaufort Arctic Storms Experiment ( BASE). We consider conditions under which emission of nuclei from the ocean surface or activation through cloud-phase chemistry could provide alternative explanations for M-PACE observations. Additional process-oriented measurements are suggested to distinguish among ice formation mechanisms in future field studies.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 134 条
[41]  
HALL WD, 1980, J ATMOS SCI, V37, P2486, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2486:ADMMWA>2.0.CO
[42]  
2
[43]   PRODUCTION OF SECONDARY ICE PARTICLES DURING RIMING PROCESS [J].
HALLETT, J ;
MOSSOP, SC .
NATURE, 1974, 249 (5452) :26-28
[44]   Cloud resolving simulations of Arctic stratus - Part II: Transition-season clouds [J].
Harrington, JY ;
Reisin, T ;
Cotton, WR ;
Kreidenweis, SM .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 1999, 51 (01) :45-75
[45]   On the potential influence of ice nuclei on surface-forced marine stratocumulus cloud dynamics [J].
Harrington, JY ;
Olsson, PQ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D21) :27473-27484
[46]   Ion-aerosol-cloud processes in the lower atmosphere [J].
Harrison, RG ;
Carslaw, KS .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 41 (03)
[47]   Phenomenology of ice formation in INTACC and SUCCESS [J].
Hegg, DA ;
Noone, KJ .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2005, 78 (1-2) :33-45
[48]  
HEYMSFIELD AJ, 1984, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V110, P765, DOI 10.1002/qj.49711046512
[49]  
HEYMSFIELD AJ, 1987, J ATMOS SCI, V44, P1088, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1088:AIATCT>2.0.CO
[50]  
2