Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses

被引：75

作者：

Al khalaf, Mohamad M. ^{[2
]}

Thalib, Lukman ^{[3
]}

Doi, Suhail A. R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Queensland, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia

[2] Sabah Hosp, Dept Med, Kuwait, Kuwait

[3] Kuwait Univ, Fac Med, Dept Community Med Biostat, Safat 13060, Kuwait

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2011年 / 64卷 / 02期

关键词：

QUALITY-EFFECTS MODEL; METHODOLOGIC QUALITY; LANDMARK METAANALYSIS; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; DISCREPANCIES; MULTICENTER; CONCLUSION; TRIALS; SCORES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.009

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：119 / 123

页数：5

共 29 条

[21]

2-2

[22] Commentary: Which meta-analyses are conclusive? [J].

Nueesch, Eveline ;

Jueni, Peter .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (01) :298-303

[23] Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative [J].

Poole, C ;

Greenland, S .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 150 (05) :469-475

[24]

Senn S, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1753

[25] Trying to be precise about vagueness [J].

Senn, Stephen .

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (07) :1417-1430

[26] Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature [J].

Sterne, JAC ;

Gavaghan, D ;

Egger, M .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (11) :1119-1129

[27]

Verhagen AP, 2002, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V18, P11

[28] No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies [J].

Whiting P. ;

Harbord R. ;

Kleijnen J. .

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5 (1)

[29] MEGA-TRIALS AND MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].

WOODS, KL .

LANCET, 1995, 346 (8975) :611-614

← 1 2 3 →