Barriers to prenatal care in Europe

被引:110
作者
Delvaux, T
Buekens, P
Godin, I
Boutsen, M
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Social Med, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
delivery of health care; health services accessibility; prenatal care; Europe;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00315-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: In Europe, it is sometimes assumed that few barriers to prenatal care exist because extensive programs of health insurance and initiatives to promote participation in prenatal care have been established for many decades. Methods: A case-control study was performed in ten European countries (Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden). Postpartum interviews were conducted between 1995 and 1996. A total of 1283 women with inadequate prenatal care (i.e., with 0, 1, or 2 prenatal care visits or a first prenatal care visit after 15 completed weeks of pregnancy) and 1280 controls with adequate prenatal care were included in the analysis combining data from the ten countries. Results: Based on combined data of the tell countries, lack of health insurance was found to be an important risk factor for inadequate prenatal care (crude odds ratio [OR] at 95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.1 [20.1-47.1]). Women with inadequate prenatal care were more likely to be aged < 20 years (16.4% vs 4.8%) and with higher parity (number of children previously borne) than controls. They were more likely to be foreign nationals, unmarried, and with an unplanned pregnancy. Women with inadequate care were also more likely to have less education and no regular income. They had more difficulties dealing with health services organization and child care. Cultural and financial barriers were present, but after adjusting for confounders by logistic regression, perceived financial difficulty was not a significant factor for inadequate prenatal care (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.7 [0.4-1.3]). Conclusions: Personal, socioeconomic, organizational, and cultural barriers to prenatal care exist in Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   POOR ANTENATAL CARE AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME [J].
BLONDEL, B ;
DUTILH, P ;
DELOUR, M ;
UZAN, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1993, 50 (03) :191-196
[2]   Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome [J].
Blondel, B ;
Marshall, B .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (08) :501-506
[3]   A COMPARISON OF PRENATAL-CARE USE IN THE UNITED-STATES AND EUROPE [J].
BUEKENS, P ;
KOTELCHUCK, M ;
BLONDEL, B ;
KRISTENSEN, FB ;
CHEN, JH ;
MASUYSTROOBANT, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :31-36
[4]   Disparity in prenatal care in Europe [J].
Delvaux, T ;
Buekens, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (02) :185-190
[5]   Insufficient prenatal care in Finland and Baden-Wurttemberg - Characteristics of women and infant outcome [J].
Gissler, M ;
Geraedts, M ;
Hemminki, E ;
Buekens, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 8 (03) :227-231
[6]   OBSTACLES TO PRENATAL-CARE FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF A COMMUNITY-BASED PROGRAM TO REDUCE FINANCIAL BARRIERS [J].
HARVEY, SM ;
FABER, KS .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 25 (01) :32-36
[7]   Antenatal care in Europe: varying ways of providing high-coverage services [J].
Hemminki, E ;
Blondel, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (01) :145-148
[8]   BARRIERS AND MOTIVATORS TO PRENATAL-CARE AMONG LOW-INCOME WOMEN [J].
HOAGBERG, BL ;
RODE, P ;
SKOVHOLT, CJ ;
OBERG, CN ;
BERG, C ;
MULLETT, S ;
CHOI, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1990, 30 (04) :487-495
[9]   BARRIERS TO PRENATAL-CARE AMONG LOW-INCOME WOMEN IN NEW-YORK-CITY [J].
KALMUSS, D ;
FENNELLY, K .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1990, 22 (05) :215-&
[10]   Prenatal care incentives in Europe [J].
McQuide, PA ;
Delvaux, T ;
Buekens, P .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 1998, 19 (03) :331-349