Evaluation of a testing-only "Express" visit option to enhance efficiency in a busy STI clinic

被引:38
作者
Shamos, Sara J. [1 ]
Mettenbrink, Christie J. [1 ]
Subiadur, Julie A. [1 ]
Mitchell, Brandy L. [1 ]
Rietmeijer, Cornelis A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Denver Publ Hlth Dept, Denver, CO 80204 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Med, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815ed7b2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the use of a testing-only "express" visit option to enhance efficiency in a busy STI clinic. Methods: At the Denver Metro Health Clinic, clients at low risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) are offered an express visit comprised of a urine test for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) as well as optional syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing, but no physical examination. Higher risk clients (STI-rellated symptoms, contact to STI, men having sex with men, injection drug use, exchange of sex for money or drugs) are offered a comprehensive visit that includes a physical examination. The triage system was evaluated for the period April 2005-July 2006 by comparing rates of CT, GC, syphilis, and HIV between the 2 visit options. Results: Of 13,447 clients with new visits, 3284 (24.4%) were express visits. When compared with clients with comprehensive visits, express visit clients had lower rates of CT (8.1% vs. 17.2%), GC (0.9% vs. 7.4%), syphillis (0.7% vs. 1.2%), and HIV (0.1% vs. 0.2%). Of 2969 STI cases, only 10.8% were diagnosed among clients with express visits. Express visits resulted in a 39% time saving for men and a 56% for women. With the possible exception of asymptomatic urethritis among men, underdiagnosis of STI beyond CT, GC, syphilis, and HIV among express visit clients appeared to be low. Conclusion: The triage system at DMHC effectively selects clients at highest risk for STI and increases clinic efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 340
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Dooley Samuel W., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P1
  • [2] Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?
    Cassell, JA
    Brook, MG
    Mercer, CH
    Murphy, S
    Johnson, A
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2003, 79 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [3] *DENV PUBL HLTH DE, 2004, CIT COUNT DENV SEX T
  • [4] Testing for Chlamydial and gonorrheal infections outside of clinic settings - A summary of the literature
    Ford, CA
    Viadro, CI
    Miller, WC
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2004, 31 (01) : 38 - 51
  • [5] Risk factors as the basis for triage in low-resource cervical cancer screening programs
    Gaffikin, L
    Ahmed, S
    Chen, YQ
    McGrath, JM
    Blumenthal, PD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2003, 80 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [6] Effectiveness of a risk-based visitor-prioritizing system at a sexually transmitted infection outpatient clinic
    Heijman, Titia L. J.
    van der Bij, Akke K.
    de Vries, Henry J. C.
    van Leent, Edwin J. M.
    Thiesbrummel, Harold F. J.
    Fennema, Han S. A.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2007, 34 (07) : 508 - 512
  • [7] Knight Vickie C, 2006, Sex Health, V3, P87, DOI 10.1071/SH05046
  • [8] Is routine vaginal examination necessary for asymptomatic women attending sexual health services?
    Lee, D. M.
    Chen, M. Y.
    Bradshaw, C. S.
    Fairley, C. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2006, 17 (09) : 631 - 632
  • [9] Trends in clinic visits and diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections after the introduction of a copayment in a sexually transmitted infection clinic
    Rietmeijer, CA
    Alfonsi, GA
    Douglas, JM
    Lloyd, LV
    Richardson, DB
    Judson, FN
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2005, 32 (04) : 243 - 246
  • [10] WONG WBJ, 2006, IMPACT PIOLOT FAST T