Mass screening with CT colonography: Should the radiation exposure be of concern?

被引:152
作者
Brenner, DJ
Georgsson, MA
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Radiol Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Hunterdon Healthcare Partners, Flemington, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Computed tomography colonography (CTC), particularly using noncathartic techniques, has the clear potential to increase compliance for colorectal cancer screening. Because the geometry for CTC is highly advantageous, it can be performed with lower radiation doses than almost any other CT examination. If CTC were to become a standard screening tool for the population age 50 years and older, the potential market in the United States would soon be over 100 million people. Therefore, it is pertinent to consider the radiation exposure and any potential radiation risk to the population from such a mass CTC screening program. Methods: Organ doses from CTC examinations can be estimated with standard techniques. These doses can be applied to organ- and dose-specific radiation cancer risk estimates to estimate the excess cancer risk resulting from the radiation from a paired (supine and prone) CTC examination. Results: The cancer risks associated with the radiation exposure from CTC are unlikely to be zero, but they are small. A best estimate for the absolute lifetime cancer risk associated with the radiation exposure using typical current scanner techniques is about 0.14% for paired CTC scans for a 50-year-old, and about half that for a 70-year-old. These values probably could be reduced by factors of 5 or 10 with optimized CTC protocols. Conclusions: In terms of the radiation exposure, the benefit-risk ratio potentially is large for CTC.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 337
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy [J].
Akerkar, GA ;
Yee, J ;
Hung, R ;
McQuaid, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (03) :310-315
[2]  
ARIAS E, 2002, NATL VITAL STAT REP, V53, P1
[3]   In-flight radiation exposure during pregnancy [J].
Barish, RJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) :1326-1330
[4]   Space radiation dosimetry in low-Earth orbit and beyond [J].
Benton, ER ;
Benton, E .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2001, 184 (1-2) :255-294
[5]   Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Doll, R ;
Goodhead, DT ;
Hall, EJ ;
Land, CE ;
Little, JB ;
Lubin, JH ;
Preston, DL ;
Preston, RJ ;
Puskin, JS ;
Ron, E ;
Sachs, RK ;
Samet, JM ;
Setlow, RB ;
Zaider, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :13761-13766
[6]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[7]   CT colonography without cathartic preparation: Feasibility study [J].
Callstrom, MR ;
Johnson, CD ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Reed, JE ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Tait, K ;
Wilson, LA ;
Corcoran, KE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :693-698
[8]   CT colonography: Value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions [J].
Chen, SC ;
Lu, DSK ;
Hecht, JR ;
Kadell, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (03) :595-599
[9]   Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence [J].
Citarda, F ;
Tomaselli, G ;
Capocaccia, R ;
Barcherini, S ;
Crespi, M .
GUT, 2001, 48 (06) :812-815
[10]  
COIN CG, 1983, COMPUT RADIOL, V7, P215