A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgements. (I). Distributions on feasible regions

被引:71
作者
Haines, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Natal, Fac Sci, Dept Stat & Biometry, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; interval judgements; polytopes; uniform distribution; random convex combinations;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00245-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the problem of extracting preferences for alternatives from interval judgement matrices in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The method of Arbel for extracting such preferences, which is based on the assumption that the interval judgements specify a feasible region in the weight space of the alternatives, is critically appraised from a statistical perspective and some new ideas emanating from this approach are developed and discussed. In particular it is proposed that a distribution for the weights on the feasible region, which is both tractable and meaningful, be adopted. The mean of the distribution can then be used as an assessment of the overall ranking of the alternatives and quantities of interest, such as probabilities and marginal distributions, can immediately be quantified. Two specific distributions on the feasible region, the uniform distribution and the distribution of random convex combinations with coefficients which are uniform spacings, are examined in some detail and the ideas which emerge are illustrated by means of selected examples. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 125
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Mattheiss TH, 1980, MATH OPER RES, V5, P167
[22]   IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CENTROID METHOD OF SOLYMOSI AND DOMBI [J].
OLSON, DL ;
DORAI, VK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 60 (01) :117-129
[23]   CALCULATING CENTROIDS IN CONSTRAINED MIXTURE EXPERIMENTS [J].
PIEPEL, GF .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1983, 25 (03) :279-283
[25]   UNCERTAINTY AND RANK ORDER IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
SAATY, TL ;
VARGAS, LG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1987, 32 (01) :107-117
[26]   COMPARISON OF EIGENVALUE, LOGARITHMIC LEAST-SQUARES AND LEAST-SQUARES METHODS IN ESTIMATING RATIOS [J].
SAATY, TL ;
VARGAS, LG .
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1984, 5 (05) :309-324
[27]  
Salo A, 1992, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P359
[28]   PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING THROUGH APPROXIMATE RATIO COMPARISONS [J].
SALO, AA ;
HAMALAINEN, RP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 82 (03) :458-475
[29]   A METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF CRITERIA - THE CENTRALIZED WEIGHTS [J].
SOLYMOSI, T ;
DOMBI, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 26 (01) :35-41
[30]   A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE [J].
STEWART, TJ .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1992, 20 (5-6) :569-586