Influences of Traffic Emissions and Meteorological Conditions on Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 Levels at a Highway Toll Station

被引:178
作者
Cheng, Yu-Hsiang [1 ]
Li, Yi-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Ming Chi Univ Technol, Dept Safety Hlth & Environm Engn, Taipei 24301, Taiwan
关键词
PM10; PM2.5; Traffic emission; Meteorological condition; Highway toll station; PARTICULATE MATTER; URBAN AREAS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; ROADSIDE; AEROSOL; MASS; EXPOSURE; TAIPEI;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2010.04.0025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The PM10 and PM2.5 levels at a highway toll station were monitored from October to December 2008. Experimental results show that hourly average PM10 and PM2.5 levels at the highway toll station were 10.6-208.4 mu g/m(3) and 6.6-187.9. mu g/m(3), respectively. Additionally, the PM2.5-to-PM10 ratio at the highway toll station was 0.73, indicating that emissions from traffic sources are dominant in PM2.5 fraction. At the highway toll station, the time variations of the PM10 and PM2.5 levels were not strongly correlated with traffic volumes; however, traffic on the highway markedly elevated ambient PM10 and PM2.5 levels. The PM10 and PM2.5 levels at the highway toll station are higher than those at monitoring stations in the vicinity to the toll station by factors of 1.3-1.4 and 1.4-1.8 times, respectively. The low wind speeds and low mixing-layer heights lead to relatively high PM10 and PM2.5 levels. Moreover, high wind speed also could have resulted in high PM10 and PM2.5 levels due to the re-suspension of particulate matter under well dispersed conditions. Measurements indicate that both traffic emissions and meteorological conditions drive PM10 and PM2.5 levels at the highway toll station.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 462
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Back-trajectory analyses of fine particulate matter measured at Big Bend National Park in the historical database and the 1996 scoping study [J].
Gebhart, KA ;
Kreidenweis, SM ;
Malm, WC .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 276 (1-3) :185-204
[12]   An assessment of the mobile source contribution to PM10 and PM2.5 in the United States [J].
Gertler, AW ;
Gillies, JA ;
Pierson, WR .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2000, 123 (1-4) :203-214
[13]   Field study of the influence of meteorological factors and traffic volumes upon suspended particle mass at urban roadside sites of differing geometries [J].
Harrison, RM ;
Jones, AM ;
Barrowcliffe, R .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (37) :6361-6369
[14]  
HINDS WC, 1999, AEROSOL TECHNOL PROP
[15]  
Ho D. S., 2004, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V4, P38, DOI DOI 10.4209/AAQR.2004.07.0004
[16]   A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium [J].
Hooyberghs, J ;
Mensink, C ;
Dumont, G ;
Fierens, F ;
Brasseur, O .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (18) :3279-3289
[17]   The size distribution and composition of the atmospheric aerosol at a rural and nearby urban location [J].
Horvath, H ;
Kasahara, M ;
Pesava, P .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1996, 27 (03) :417-435
[18]   Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) among highway toll station workers in Taipei:: Direct and indirect exposure assessment [J].
Lai, CH ;
Liou, SH ;
Shih, TS ;
Tsai, PJ ;
Chen, HL ;
Chang, YC ;
Buckley, TJ ;
Strickland, P ;
Jaakkola, JJK .
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2004, 59 (03) :138-148
[19]  
MARSIK FJ, 1995, J APPL METEOROL, V34, P1802, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1802:COMFEM>2.0.CO
[20]  
2