Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

被引:1625
作者
Kawamoto, K
Houlihan, CA
Balas, EA
Lobach, DF
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Community & Family Med, Div Clin Informat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 330卷 / 7494期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To identify features of clinical decision support systems critical for improving clinical practice. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Literature searches via Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to 2003; and searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews. Study selection Studies had to evaluate the ability of decision support systems to improve clinical practice. Data extraction Studies were assessed for statistically and clinically significant improvement in clinical practice and for the presence of 15 decision support system features whose importance had been repeatedly suggested in the literature. Results Seventy studies were included. Decision support systems significantly improved clinical practice in 68% of trials. Univariate analyses revealed that, for five of the system features, interventions possessing the feature were significantly more likely to improve clinical practice than interventions lacking the feature. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified four features as independent predictors of improved clinical practice: automatic provision of decision support as part of clinician workflow (P < 0.00001), provision of recommendations rather than just assessments (P = 0.0187), provision of decision support at the time and location of decision making (P = 0.0263), and computer based decision support (P = 0.0294). Of 32 systems possessing all four features, 30 (94%) significantly improved clinical practice. Furthermore, direct experimental justification was found for providing periodic performance feedback, sharing recommendations with patients, and requesting documentation of reasons for not following recommendations. Conclusions Several features were closely correlated with decision support systems' ability to improve patient care significantly. Clinicians and other stakeholders should implement clinical decision support systems that incorporate these features whenever feasible and appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 768E
页数:9
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [61] PHYSICIAN RESPONSE TO COMPUTER REMINDERS
    MCDONALD, CJ
    WILSON, GA
    MCCABE, GP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 244 (14): : 1579 - 1581
  • [62] REMINDERS TO PHYSICIANS FROM AN INTROSPECTIVE COMPUTER MEDICAL RECORD
    MCDONALD, CJ
    HUI, SL
    SMITH, DM
    TIERNEY, WM
    COHEN, SJ
    WEINBERGER, M
    MCCABE, GP
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 100 (01) : 130 - 138
  • [63] MCDOWELL I, 1989, J FAM PRACTICE, V28, P420
  • [64] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF COMPUTERIZED REMINDERS FOR BLOOD-PRESSURE SCREENING IN PRIMARY CARE
    MCDOWELL, I
    NEWELL, C
    ROSSER, W
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) : 297 - 305
  • [65] MCDOWELL I, 1986, CAN MED ASSOC J, V135, P991
  • [66] PROMOTING CANCER SCREENING - A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF 3 INTERVENTIONS
    MCPHEE, SJ
    BIRD, JA
    JENKINS, CNH
    FORDHAM, D
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 149 (08) : 1866 - 1872
  • [67] PROMOTING CANCER PREVENTION ACTIVITIES BY PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL
    MCPHEE, SJ
    BIRD, JA
    FORDHAM, D
    RODNICK, JE
    OSBORN, EH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 266 (04): : 538 - 544
  • [68] REDUCTION OF POLYPHARMACY BY FEEDBACK TO CLINICIAN
    MEYER, TJ
    VANKOOTEN, D
    MARSH, S
    PROCHAZKA, AV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 6 (02) : 133 - 136
  • [69] Nilasena D S, 1995, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care, P640
  • [70] EFFECTS OF MEDICAID DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW INTERVENTION LETTERS
    OKANO, GJ
    RASCATI, KL
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 17 (03) : 525 - 533