Towards a comprehensive model for the study of compliance in orthodontics

被引:38
作者
Bos, A
Hoogstraten, J
Prahl-Andersen, B
机构
[1] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Orthodont, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol Methods, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cji003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aims of the present study were to explore methods used by Dutch orthodontists in daily practice to estimate and stimulate patient compliance, and to develop a theoretical model of compliance. A questionnaire, containing 38 items, was distributed among participants at the annual congress of the Dutch Society of Orthodontists in September 2002. The items concerned the need for and the level of patient adherence during orthodontic treatment, modes of estimating and stimulating compliance, and perceived reasons for non-compliance. Based on this pilot study and on an extensive literature search, a model for future research was developed in which concepts related to compliance in orthodontics were systematically organized. Of the 88 orthodontists who attended the congress, 51 responded (mean age 47 years, 22 per cent females). The respondents considered compliance to be of vital importance for a successful treatment result. Most patients were regarded as moderate compliers. The respondents believed that a lack of awareness of dental problems, a lack of motivation to co-operate, and personal problems were the main reasons for non-compliance. Only indirect methods were used to estimate compliance. It was concluded that Dutch orthodontists used subjective methods to measure compliance in daily practice, and that a theoretical model was needed to be able to examine compliance in orthodontics in a more systematic way. A multiple assessment of compliance, using a variety of research methods, seems to be the most appropriate way at present to ensure accuracy in measuring levels of patient compliance in orthodontics.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 301
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   CLINICAL VERSUS QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF HEADGEAR COMPLIANCE [J].
CURETON, SL ;
REGENNITTER, FJ ;
YANCEY, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1993, 104 (03) :277-284
[12]  
DEGROOT AD, 1981, METHODOLOGIE GRONDSL
[13]   PHYSICIANS CHARACTERISTICS INFLUENCE PATIENTS ADHERENCE TO MEDICAL-TREATMENT - RESULTS FROM THE MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY [J].
DIMATTEO, MR ;
SHERBOURNE, CD ;
HAYS, RD ;
ORDWAY, L ;
KRAVITZ, RL ;
MCGLYNN, EA ;
KAPLAN, S ;
ROGERS, WH .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 12 (02) :93-102
[14]   FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ORTHODONTIC PATIENT COMPLIANCE WITH INTRAORAL ELASTIC AND HEADGEAR WEAR [J].
EGOLF, RJ ;
BEGOLE, EA ;
UPSHAW, HS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1990, 97 (04) :336-348
[15]   UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING PATIENT COMPLIANCE [J].
ERAKER, SA ;
KIRSCHT, JP ;
BECKER, MH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 100 (02) :258-268
[16]  
Fishbein M., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[17]  
Glenny A-M, 2003, J Orthod, V30, P159, DOI 10.1093/ortho/30.2.159
[18]  
GROSS A M, 1988, Journal of Pedodontics, V12, P128
[20]  
Judd C.M., 1991, Research methods in social relations, V6th