How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks

被引:125
作者
Brady, William J. [1 ]
McLoughlin, Killian [1 ]
Doan, Tuan N. [2 ]
Crockett, Molly J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, New Haven, CT USA
来源
SCIENCE ADVANCES | 2021年 / 7卷 / 33期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
NEGATIVE EMOTIONS; INFORMATION; PSYCHOLOGY; DIFFUSION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; DOPAMINE; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1126/sciadv.abe5641
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Moral outrage shapes fundamental aspects of social life and is now widespread in online social networks. Here, we show how social learning processes amplify online moral outrage expressions over time. In two preregistered observational studies on Twitter (7331 users and 12.7 million total tweets) and two preregistered behavioral experiments (N = 240), we find that positive social feedback for outrage expressions increases the likelihood of future outrage expressions, consistent with principles of reinforcement learning. In addition, users conform their outrage expressions to the expressive norms of their social networks, suggesting norm learning also guides online outrage expressions. Norm learning overshadows reinforcement learning when normative information is readily observable: in ideologically extreme networks, where outrage expression is more common, users are less sensitive to social feedback when deciding whether to express outrage. Our findings highlight how platform design interacts with human learning mechanisms to affect moral discourse in digital public spaces.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [61] Li J., 2016, P NAACL, DOI 10.18653/v1/N16-1082
  • [62] How instructed knowledge modulates the neural systems of reward learning
    Li, Jian
    Delgado, Mauricio R.
    Phelps, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [63] Libbey P., 2019, NEW YORK TIMES
  • [64] Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes
    Lieberman, Alicea
    Schroeder, Juliana
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 31 : 16 - 21
  • [65] Lindstrom B., 2019, PSYARXIV
  • [66] Liptak Adam., 2019, NEW YORK TIMES
  • [67] Lynch M., 2019, WE REALLY UNDERSTAND
  • [68] Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties
    Marcus, George E.
    Valentino, Nicholas A.
    Vasilopoulos, Pavlos
    Foucault, Martial
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 40 : 109 - 139
  • [69] McCarty N., 2016, Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches
  • [70] Mervosh S., 2019, The New York Times