Relevance of CONSORT reporting criteria for research on eHealth interventions

被引:65
作者
Baker, Timothy B. [1 ]
Gustafson, David H. [2 ]
Shaw, Bret [3 ]
Hawkins, Robert [4 ]
Pingree, Suzy [3 ]
Roberts, Linda [5 ]
Strecher, Victor [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Excellence Canc Commun, Dept Med, Univ Wisconsin Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Engn, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Life Sci Commun, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Dev, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ctr Hlth Commun Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
eHealth; Experimental methods; Consort; Research reporting standards; Randomized clinical trials; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; HEALTH INFORMATION; BREAST-CANCER; INTERNET; SUPPORT; QUALITY; WEB; STATEMENT; EFFICACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: In 1996, 2001, and 2010, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group released criteria for reporting critical information about randomized clinical trials [1,2]. These criteria were intended to improve the quality and completeness of reporting of RCTs in health care research. This paper discusses the relevance of the CONSORT recommendations for the reporting and design of eHealth research. Methods: We reviewed the CONSORT recommendations and discussed their particular relevance to eHealth (electronic information, support and/or communication resources designed to promote health) research. This review focuses on such issues as recruitment and screening of participants, description of treatment elements, and reporting of outcome data and adverse events. Results: eHealth research presents special challenges regarding the comprehensive and effective reporting of research information. However, the strategic application of CONSORT recommendations holds great promise for improving the quality and informativeness of eHealth research. Conclusion: Investigators need to consider CONSORT recommendations at all stages of the research enterprise, including planning, execution and reporting in order to increase the informativeness of their research efforts. Practice implications: The recommendations contained in this paper have the potential to enhance the public health and scientific value of eHealth research. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S77 / S86
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the Internet [J].
Crocco, AG ;
Villasis-Keever, M ;
Jadad, AR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2869-2871
[12]   Methodological Issues in Research on Web-Based Behavioral Interventions [J].
Danaher, Brian G. ;
Seeley, John R. .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2009, 38 (01) :28-39
[13]   Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it? [J].
Davidson, KW ;
Goldstein, M ;
Kaplan, RM ;
Kaufmann, PG ;
Knatterud, GL ;
Orleans, CT ;
Spring, B ;
Trudeau, KJ ;
Whitlock, EP .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2003, 26 (03) :161-171
[14]   Registering randomized clinical trials and the case for CONSORT [J].
Elliott, Timothy R. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 15 (06) :511-518
[15]   Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to- effectiveness transition [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Lichtenstein, E ;
Marcus, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (08) :1261-1267
[16]   Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Vogt, TM ;
Boles, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) :1322-1327
[17]   BIOCHEMICAL VALIDATION OF SMOKING STATUS - PROS, CONS, AND DATA FROM 4 LOW-INTENSITY INTERVENTION TRIALS [J].
GLASGOW, RE ;
MULLOOLY, JP ;
VOGT, TM ;
STEVENS, VJ ;
LICHTENSTEIN, E ;
HOLLIS, JF ;
LANDO, HA ;
SEVERSON, HH ;
PEARSON, KA ;
VOGT, MR .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1993, 18 (05) :511-527
[18]   Reach, engagement, and retention in an internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial [J].
Glasgow, Russell E. ;
Nelson, Candace C. ;
Kearney, Kathleen A. ;
Reid, Robert ;
Ritzwoller, Debra P. ;
Strecher, Victor J. ;
Couper, Mick P. ;
Green, Beverly ;
Wildenhaus, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (02) :e11
[19]   Diversity and accessibility of smoking cessation aids in the Internet [J].
Griesam, N. ;
Meyer, C. ;
Haug, S. ;
Ruege, J. ;
Schumann, A. ;
Rumpf, H. -J. ;
John, U. .
GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2008, 70 (06) :372-376
[20]   Internet-based interactive support for cancer patients: Are integrated systems better? [J].
Gustafson, David H. ;
Hawkins, Robert ;
McTavish, Fiona ;
Pingree, Suzanne ;
Chen, Wei Chih ;
Volrathongchai, Kanittha ;
Stengle, William ;
Stewart, James A. ;
Serlin, Ronald C. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2008, 58 (02) :238-257