Living Kidney Donors Ages 70 and Older: Recipient and Donor Outcomes

被引:110
作者
Berger, Jonathan C. [1 ]
Muzaale, Abimereki D. [1 ,2 ]
James, Nathan [1 ]
Hoque, Mohammed [3 ]
Wang, Jacqueline M. Garonzik [1 ]
Montgomery, Robert A. [1 ]
Massie, Allan B. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, Erin C. [1 ]
Segev, Dorry L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2011年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
PAIRED DONATION; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.04160511
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Background and objectives The profound organ shortage has resulted in longer waiting times and increased mortality for those awaiting kidney transplantation. Consequently, patients are turning to older living donors. It is unclear if an upper age limit for donation should exist, both in terms of recipient and donor outcomes. Design, setting, participants, & measurements In the United States, 219 healthy adults aged >= 70 have donated kidneys at 80 of 279 transplant centers. Competing risks models with matched controls were used to study the independent association between older donor age and allograft survival, accounting for the competing risk of recipient mortality as well as other transplant factors. Results Among recipients of older live donor allografts, graft loss was significantly higher than matched 50-to 59-year-old live donor allografts (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 2.28, P = 0.005) but similar to matched nonextended criteria 50-to 59-year-old deceased donor allografts (SHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.63, P = 0.3). Mortality among living kidney donors aged >= 70 was no higher than healthy matched controls drawn from the NHANES-III cohort; in fact, mortality was lower, probably reflecting higher selectivity among older live donors than could be captured in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES-III; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.65, P < 0.001). Conclusions These findings support living donation among older adults but highlight the advantages of finding a younger donor, particularly for younger recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 2887-2893, 2011. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04160511
引用
收藏
页码:2887 / 2893
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Bingaman AW, N ENGL J MED, V363, P1091
[2]
Cumulative incidence estimation in the presence of competing risks [J].
Coviello, Vincenzo ;
Boggess, May .
STATA JOURNAL, 2004, 4 (02) :103-112
[3]
DOLS LF, AM J TRANSPLANT, V11, P737
[4]
Effect of donor-recipient age difference on graft function and survival in live-donor kidney transplantation [J].
Ferrari, Paolo ;
Lim, Wai ;
Dent, Hannah ;
McDonald, Stephen P. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 26 (02) :702-708
[5]
A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[6]
Freedman L S, 1982, Stat Med, V1, P121, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780010204
[7]
ESTIMATION OF LORENZ-CURVE AND GINI-INDEX [J].
GASTWIRT.JL .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1972, 54 (03) :306-316
[8]
Expanding kidney paired donation through participation by compatible pairs [J].
Gentry, S. E. ;
Segev, D. L. ;
Simmerling, M. ;
Montgomery, R. A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (10) :2361-2370
[9]
Long-Term Consequences of Kidney Donation. [J].
Ibrahim, Hassan N. ;
Foley, Robert ;
Tan, LiPing ;
Rogers, Tyson ;
Bailey, Robert F. ;
Guo, Hongfei ;
Gross, Cynthia R. ;
Matas, Arthur J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (05) :459-469
[10]
Older living donors provide excellent quality kidneys: a single center experience (older living donors) [J].
Johnson, SR ;
Khwaja, K ;
Pavlakis, M ;
Monaco, AP ;
Hanto, DW .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 19 (05) :600-606