The politics and practice of television ratings conventions: Australian and American approaches to broadcast ratings

被引:5
作者
Balnaves, Mark [1 ]
O'Regan, Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Dept Internet Studies, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch English Media Studies & Art Hist, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
CONTINUUM-JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES | 2010年 / 24卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10304311003703090
中图分类号
G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;
摘要
As we now know, once you introduce audience ratings, as China has done, you have not just introduced 'a measure'; you have introduced a huge apparatus that brings with it certain types of agreements, values and behaviours. No doubt, China's leaders saw the ratings as a neutral mechanism in mapping broadcast audiences. The history of ratings, however, is quite the opposite. It is a set of standards, values and conventions that drives particular kinds of expectations in organizations, technology and content. Audience ratings first provided a coordination rule for advertiser-supported media and then became a convention, harnessed by TV to change media economics. In this paper the authors provide an insight into how audience ratings, as a convention - a compact - emerged in Australia and America, and some of the major differences between them.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 474
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Albarran A. B., 2006, MANAGEMENT ELECT MED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1946, TIME 0930
[3]  
[Anonymous], FACEBOOKS NEW TERMS
[4]  
Balnaves M., 2002, MOBILISING AUDIENCE, P29
[5]  
Beville H., 1985, AUDIENCE RATINGS RAD
[6]  
BODEY M, 2008, AUSTRALIAN 0320
[7]   IS IT TIME TO DISCARD AUDIENCE CONCEPT [J].
BOGART, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1966, 30 (01) :47-54
[8]  
Bogart L., 2000, COMMERCIAL CULTURE M
[9]  
*COMM RAD AUSTR, 2007, EL MEAS GLOB OV AUST
[10]  
CROSSLEY H, 2008, COMMUNICATION 1015