Panel of serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of lung cancer

被引:190
作者
Patz, Edward F., Jr. [1 ]
Campa, Michael J.
Gottlin, Elizabeth B.
Kusmartseva, Irina
Guan, Xiang Rong
Herndon, James E., II
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5392
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Currently, a blood test for lung cancer does not exist. Serum biomarkers that could aid clinicians in making case management decisions would be enormously valuable. We used two proteomic platforms and a literature search to select candidate serum markers for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods We initially assayed six serum proteins, four discovered by proteomics and two previously known to be cancer associated, on a training set of sera from 100 patients (50 with a new diagnosis of lung cancer and 50 age- and sex-matched controls). Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis selected a panel of four markers that most efficiently predicted which patients had lung cancer. An independent, blinded validation set of sera from 97 patients (49 lung cancer patients and 48 matched controls) determined the accuracy of the four markers to predict which patients had lung cancer. Results Four serum proteins-carcinoembryonic antigen, retinol binding protein, alpha 1-antitrypsin, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen-were collectively found to correctly classify the majority of lung cancer and control patients in the training set (sensitivity, 89.3%; specificity, 84.7%). These markers also accurately classified patients in the independent validation set (sensitivity, 77.8%; specificity, 75.4%). Remarkably, 90% of patients who fell into any one of three groupings in the CART analysis had lung cancer. Conclusion This panel of four serum proteins is valuable in suggesting the diagnosis of lung cancer. These data may be useful for treating patients with an indeterminate pulmonary lesion, and potentially in predicting individuals at high risk for lung cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:5578 / 5583
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes [J].
Bach, Peter B. ;
Jett, James R. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Tockman, Melvyn S. ;
Swensen, Stephen J. ;
Begg, Colin B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (09) :953-961
[2]   Macrophages: Obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis [J].
Condeelis, J ;
Pollard, JW .
CELL, 2006, 124 (02) :263-266
[3]   Mechanisms of disease: Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation [J].
Gabay, C ;
Kushner, I .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (06) :448-454
[4]  
Henschke CI, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P1763, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa060476
[5]  
Kulpa J, 2002, CLIN CHEM, V48, P1931
[6]  
Li B., 1984, BIOMETRICS, V40, P358, DOI DOI 10.2307/2530946
[7]   Screening of alpha-1-antitrypsin gene by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) [J].
Ljujic, Mila ;
Nikolic, Aleksandra ;
Divac, Aleksandra ;
Djordjevic, Valentina ;
Radojkovic, Dragica .
JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL METHODS, 2006, 68 (03) :167-173
[8]   Lung, cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers - A decision and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Mahadevia, PJ ;
Fleisher, LA ;
Fric, KD ;
Eng, J ;
Goodman, SN ;
Powe, NR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (03) :313-322
[9]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting [J].
Manser, R ;
Dalton, A ;
Carter, R ;
Byrnes, G ;
Elwood, M ;
Campbell, DA .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 48 (02) :171-185
[10]   Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: Impact of extended follow-up [J].
Marcus, PM ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Fagerstrom, RM ;
Williams, DE ;
Fontana, R ;
Taylor, WF ;
Prorok, PC .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (16) :1308-1316