Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling

被引:69
作者
Manzoni, C
DiFilippo, S
Corti, M
Locatelli, F
机构
[1] Dept. of Nephrology and Dialysis, Lecco Hospital, Lecco
[2] Nephrology Division, Hospital of Lecco, 22053 Lecco
关键词
conductivity; direct quantification; effective urea clearance; Kt/V determination; ionic dialysance; urea distribution volume;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027091
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. It is well known that the difference between prescribed and delivered dialysis doses greatly affects the morbidity and mortality of dialysed patients. The on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis is therefore of paramount importance. Recently, a conductivity-based method for determining Kt/V on a routine basis has been proposed. Methods. The study was performed using a specially designed module (Biofeedback Module, COT, Hospal) which, when connected to a dialysis monitor, automatically determines effective ionic dialysance (ID). During three consecutive dialysis sessions, administered to each of eight patients at the same depurative efficiency, we deter-mined Kt/V by using mean effective ionic dialysance and by assuming, as suggested, that urea distribution volume corresponded to 55% of body weight. This method was compared with the gold standard of the direct quantification method. The Kt/V was also calculated by using mean effective ionic dialysance and the volume of urea distribution derived from anthropometric parameters. Results. The Kt/V determined by using mean effective ionic dialysance and by assuming that urea distribution volume corresponded to 55% of body weight was heavily underestimated (-22%). This difference was due to both the overestimate of urea distribution volume (+17%) and underestimate of effective urea clearance (KUeff) (-11%). The mean Kt/V calculated on the basis of ionic dialysance and anthropometric volume was also underestimated (-23%) since this volume was overestimated (+17%). Nevertheless, ionic dialysance and urea clearance proved to be closely correlated (r(2) = 0.89) so that effective urea clearance can be derived according to: Kueff = ID x 0.865 + 39.89. Conclusions. In steady-state patients, once urea distribution volume has been correctly determined by means of direct quantification, effective urea clearance can be easily derived from ionic dialysance and Kt/V calculated on-line at each session, without blood sampling or any additional costs.
引用
收藏
页码:2023 / 2030
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, REPLACEMENT RENAL FU
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Depner T., 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, V4, P343
[4]  
EBBEN J, 1996, 42 ANN C ASAIO WASH, P81
[5]  
ELLIS PW, 1984, T AM SOC ART INT ORG, V30, P60
[6]  
GOTCH F, 1995, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V6, P600
[7]   A KINETIC SURVEY OF UNITED-STATES HEMODIALYSIS PRESCRIPTIONS [J].
GOTCH, FA ;
YARIAN, S ;
KEEN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1990, 15 (05) :511-515
[8]   A MECHANISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL COOPERATIVE DIALYSIS STUDY (NCDS) [J].
GOTCH, FA ;
SARGENT, JA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 28 (03) :526-534
[9]  
Gotch FA, 1990, CLIN DIALYSIS, P118
[10]  
HELD PJ, 1991, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V2, P238