Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars

被引:147
作者
van der Wal, Martijn B. A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Tuinebreijer, Wim E. [5 ]
Bloemen, Monica C. T. [4 ,5 ]
Verhaegen, Pauline D. H. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Middelkoop, Esther [3 ,4 ,5 ]
van Zuijlen, Paul P. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Red Cross Hosp, Burn Ctr, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[5] Assoc Dutch Burn Ctr, Beverwijk, Netherlands
关键词
Quality of life; Scar quality; POSAS; Rasch; Scar assessment; Burn scar; LINEAR SCARS; FACIAL SCARS; SILICONE GEL; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is a questionnaire that was developed to assess scar quality. It consists of two separate six-item scales (Observer Scale and Patient Scale), both of which are scored on a 10-point rating scale. After many years of experience with this scale in burn scar assessment, it is appropriate to examine its psychometric properties using Rasch analysis. Cross-sectional data collection from seven clinical trials resulted in a data set of 1,629 observer scores and 1,427 patient scores of burn scars. We examined the person-item map, item fit statistics, reliability, response category ordering, and dimensionality of the POSAS. The POSAS showed an adequate fit to the Rasch model, except for the item surface area. Person reliability of the Observer Scale and Patient Scale was 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Dimensionality analysis revealed that the unexplained variance by the first contrast of both scales was 1.7 units. Spearman correlation between the Observer Scale Rasch measure and the overall opinion of the clinician was 0.75. The Rasch model demonstrated that the POSAS is a reliable and valid scale that measures the single-construct scar quality.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 23
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
[Anonymous], PROBALISTIC MODELS S
[2]
Percutaneous collagen induction therapy: An alternative treatment for scars, wrinkles, and skin laxity [J].
Aust, Matthias C. ;
Fernandes, Des ;
Kolokythas, Perikles ;
Kaplan, Hilton M. ;
Vogt, Peter M. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (04) :1421-1429
[3]
Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for Evaluation of Facial Scars Treated With Self-Drying Silicone Gel [J].
Bianchi, Francesca A. ;
Roccia, Fabio ;
Fiorini, Paola ;
Berrone, Sid .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 21 (03) :719-723
[4]
Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools [J].
Brusselaers, Nele ;
Pirayesh, Ali ;
Hoeksema, Henk ;
Verbelen, Jozef ;
Blot, Stijn ;
Monstrey, Stan .
BURNS, 2010, 36 (08) :1157-1164
[5]
Cromi A., 2010, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V203, p36e31
[7]
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tuinebreijer, WE ;
Middelkoop, E ;
Kreis, RW ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (07) :1960-1965
[8]
Current scales for assessing human scarring: A review [J].
Durani, Piyush ;
McGrouther, D. A. ;
Ferguson, M. W. J. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (06) :713-720
[9]
Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview [J].
Falder, Sian ;
Browne, Allyson ;
Edgar, Dale ;
Staples, Emma ;
Fong, Joy ;
Rea, Suzanne ;
Wood, Fiona .
BURNS, 2009, 35 (05) :618-641
[10]
Fisher WJ., 1992, RASCH MEASUREMENT T, V6, P238