Rasch analysis of 24-, 18-and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

被引:36
作者
Davidson, Megan [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Rasch analysis; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; Low back pain; Questionnaires; Health status; LOW-BACK-PAIN; OUTCOME MEASURES; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; REHABILITATION; RESPONSIVENESS; VALIDATION; SCIATICA; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-009-9456-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine fit of the original 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and three short-form versions to a Rasch model with particular attention to targeting of item difficulty and to differential item functioning. Cross-sectional survey of 140 people with low back pain seeking physiotherapy treatment. Data were analysed using a dichotomous Rasch model. All versions showed adequate overall data fit to the Rasch model, with few misfitting items. Person separation was around 0.85 for all versions. Item 5 (use a handrail to get upstairs) showed differential item functioning by age. Targeting of persons of high ability was poor and short-form versions also had poor targeting of persons of low ability. Items of similar difficulty clustered in the centre of the logit scale. Although the Roland data fit the Rasch model, there were insufficient items of higher difficulty to sufficiently evaluate disability in persons with mild disability. Short-form versions also lacked items of lower difficulty.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 481
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: A 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis - Results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
van den Ancker, M ;
Singer, DE ;
Keller, RB ;
Patrick, DL .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (16) :1869-1876
[2]
THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[3]
Letting the CAT out of the bag - Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [J].
Cook, Karon F. ;
Choi, Seung W. ;
Crane, Paul K. ;
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Johnson, Kurt L. ;
Amtmann, Dagmar .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (12) :1378-1383
[4]
A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: Reliability and responsiveness [J].
Davidson, M ;
Keating, JL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (01) :8-24
[5]
Rasch analysis of the Roland Disability Questionnaire [J].
Garratt, AM .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (01) :79-84
[6]
Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires [J].
Grotle, M ;
Brox, JI ;
Vollestad, NK .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) :130-140
[7]
Haigh R, 2001, J REHABIL MED, V33, P273
[8]
Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain [J].
Küçükdeveci, AA ;
Tennant, A ;
Elhan, AH ;
Niyazoglu, H .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (24) :2738-2743
[9]
Linacre JM, 1994, Rasch Measurement Transactions, V7, P328
[10]
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain [J].
Ostelo, RWJG ;
de Vet, HCW .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) :593-607