Letting the CAT out of the bag - Comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

被引:42
作者
Cook, Karon F. [1 ]
Choi, Seung W. [2 ,3 ]
Crane, Paul K. [4 ]
Deyo, Richard A. [5 ]
Johnson, Kurt L. [1 ]
Amtmann, Dagmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Evanston NW Healthcare, Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
health status; item response theory; measurement; outcomes; quality of life;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181732acb
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A post hoc simulation of a computer adaptive administration of the items of a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive administration of back pain-related disability items compared with a fixed 11-item short form. Summary of Background Data. Short form versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire have been developed. An alternative to paper-and-pencil short forms is to administer items adaptively so that items are presented based on a person's responses to previous items. Theoretically, this allows precise estimation of back pain disability with administration of only a few items. Materials and Methods. Data were gathered from 2 previously conducted studies of persons with back pain. An item response theory model was used to calibrate scores based on all items, items of a paper-and-pencil short form, and several computer adaptive tests (CATs). Results. Correlations between each CAT condition and scores based on a 23-item version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire ranged from 0.93 to 0.98. Compared with an 11-item short form, an 11-item CAT produced scores that were significantly more highly correlated with scores based on the 23-item scale. CATs with even fewer items also produced scores that were highly correlated with scores based on all items. For example, scores from a 5-item CAT had a correlation of 0.93 with full scale scores. Seven-and 9-item CATs correlated at 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. A CAT with a standard-error-based stopping rule produced scores that correlated at 0.95 with full scale scores. Conclusion. A CAT-based back pain-related disability measure may be a valuable tool for use in clinical and research contexts. Use of CAT for other common measures in back pain research, such as other functional scales or measures of psychological distress, may offer similar advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:1378 / 1383
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Andres Patricia L, 2004, Top Stroke Rehabil, V11, P33
[2]
The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: A 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis - Results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
van den Ancker, M ;
Singer, DE ;
Keller, RB ;
Patrick, DL .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (16) :1869-1876
[3]
THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[4]
BJORNER JB, 2006, IRTFIT MACRO ITEM FI
[5]
Development of a Flexilevel Scale for use with computer-adaptive testing for assessing shoulder function [J].
Cook, KF ;
Roddey, TS ;
O'Malley, KJ ;
Gartsman, GM .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 14 (01) :90S-94S
[6]
Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag? [J].
Cook, KF ;
O'Malley, KJ ;
Roddey, TS .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (05) :1694-1711
[7]
CRANE PK, 2007, QUAL LIFE RES
[8]
A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Mirza, SK ;
Heagerty, PJ ;
Turner, JA ;
Martin, BI .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2005, 6 (1)
[9]
A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component [J].
Dijkers, MP .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (03) :384-393
[10]
Edwards P, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3]