Risk Factors and Outcomes for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery: A Single-Institution Analysis of 1576 Patients

被引:159
作者
Boccola, Mark A. [1 ]
Buettner, Petra G. [2 ]
Rozen, Warren M. [1 ]
Siu, Simon K. [3 ]
Stevenson, Andrew R. L. [3 ]
Stitz, Russell [4 ]
Ho, Yik-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Discipline Surg, Sch Med, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia
[2] James Cook Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Div Colorectal Surg, Dept Surg, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Discipline Surg, Sch Med, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia
关键词
SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; POTENTIALLY CURATIVE RESECTION; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; MULTIVISCERAL RESECTION; STAPLED ANASTOMOSES; ANTERIOR RESECTION; PELVIC DRAINAGE; RECTAL-CANCER; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Anastomotic leakage is associated with high mortality, high reoperation rate, and increased hospital length of stay. Although many studies have examined the risk factors for anastomotic leak, large prospective series that report on long-term survival rates are lacking. Methods Data of 1576 patients who underwent primary resection and anastomosis for colorectal adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 1984 to 2004 were prospectively collected. Anastomotic leaks (LEK) were classified as radiological (RAD), local (LOC), or generalised (GEN). Logistic regression analysis of 21 variables was undertaken. Overall survival, cancer-related survival, and disease-free survival were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Mean age of the patients was 67 years (SD = 12.5) and 834 (52.9%) were male. An LEK was more likely when relatively major gynaecological (tubo-oophorectomy, P = 0.004; hysterectomy, P = 0.006) or urological (total cystectomy, P = 0.014) procedures were performed during the same operative session. Other significant factors were anterior resection (P < 0.001), anastomosis using an intraluminal stapling device (P = 0.005), abdominal drain via laparoscopic port (P = 0.024), postoperative blood transfusion (P < 0.001), primary cancer site at the rectum (P = 0.016), and TNM stage of T2 or higher (P = 0.026). Having an LEK showed significant impact on overall (P = 0.021), cancer-related (P = 0.006), and disease-free (P = 0.001) survival. Conclusion In this prospective study, advanced tumour stage, distal site, and need for postoperative blood transfusion were associated with increased rates of anastomotic leakage. In addition to their high risk of immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality, both localized and generalized leaks had similarly negative impacts on overall, cancer-related, and disease-free survival.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 195
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]   Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery -: A meta-analysis [J].
MacRae, HM ;
McLeod, RS .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (02) :180-189
[22]   Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis [J].
Mäkelä, JT ;
Kiviniemi, H ;
Laitinen, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (05) :653-660
[23]  
Matthiessen P, 2004, Colorectal Dis, V6, P462, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x
[24]   Colon cancer: Resection standards [J].
Maurer C.A. .
Techniques in Coloproctology, 2004, 8 (Suppl 1) :S29-S32
[25]   Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer [J].
McArdle, CS ;
McMillan, DC ;
Hole, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (09) :1150-1154
[26]   Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer [J].
McMillan, DC ;
Canna, K ;
McArdle, CS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (02) :215-219
[27]   Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis?: A multicenter controlled randomized trial [J].
Merad, F ;
Hay, JM ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yahchouchi, E ;
Laborde, Y ;
Pélissier, E ;
Msika, S ;
Flamant, Y .
SURGERY, 1999, 125 (05) :529-535
[28]   Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, the related cytokine response and long-term survival after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer [J].
Miki, C ;
Hiro, J ;
Ojima, E ;
Inoue, Y ;
Mohri, Y ;
Kusunoki, M .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 18 (01) :60-66
[29]   Comparison of multivisceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome [J].
Nakafusa, Y ;
Tanaka, T ;
Tanaka, M ;
Kitajima, Y ;
Sato, S ;
Miyazaki, K .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (12) :2055-2063
[30]   Practice parameters for colon cancer [J].
Otchy, D ;
Hyman, NH ;
Simmang, C ;
Anthony, T ;
Buie, WD ;
Cataldo, P ;
Church, J ;
Cohen, J ;
Dentsman, F ;
Ellis, CN ;
Kilkenny, JW ;
Ko, C ;
Moore, R ;
Orsay, C ;
Place, R ;
Rafferty, J ;
Rakinic, J ;
Savoca, P ;
Tjandra, J ;
Whiteford, M .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (08) :1269-1284