Protein evolution in the context of Drosophila development

被引:43
作者
Davis, JC
Brandman, O
Petrov, DA
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Mol Pharmacol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
expression profile; developmental constraint; phylotypic stage; nonsynonymous rate; synonymous rate;
D O I
10.1007/s00239-004-0241-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The tempo at which a protein evolves depends not only on the rate at which mutations arise but also on the selective effects that those mutations have at the organismal level. It is intuitive that proteins functioning during different stages of development may be predisposed to having mutations of different selective effects. For example, it has been hypothesized that changes to proteins expressed during early development should have larger phenotypic consequences because later stages depend on them. Conversely, changes to proteins expressed much later in development should have smaller consequences at the organismal level. Here we assess whether proteins expressed at different times during Drosophila development vary systematically in their rates of evolution. We find that proteins expressed early in development and particularly during mid-late embryonic development evolve unusually slowly. In addition, proteins expressed in adult males show an elevated evolutionary rate. These two trends are independent of each other and cannot be explained by peculiar rates of mutation or levels of codon bias. Moreover, the observed patterns appear to hold across several functional classes of genes, although the exact developmental time of the slowest protein evolution differs among each class. We discuss our results in connection with data on the evolution of development.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / U42
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Gene expression and molecular evolution [J].
Akashi, H .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 11 (06) :660-666
[2]   Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Arbeitman, MN ;
Furlong, EEM ;
Imam, F ;
Johnson, E ;
Null, BH ;
Baker, BS ;
Krasnow, MA ;
Scott, MP ;
Davis, RW ;
White, KP .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5590) :2270-2275
[3]   The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms [J].
Arthur, W .
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 2 (01) :49-57
[4]  
ARTHUR W, 1988, THEORY EVOUTION DEV
[5]  
Arthur W, 1997, ORIGIN ANIMAL BODY P
[6]   Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology [J].
Ashburner, M ;
Ball, CA ;
Blake, JA ;
Botstein, D ;
Butler, H ;
Cherry, JM ;
Davis, AP ;
Dolinski, K ;
Dwight, SS ;
Eppig, JT ;
Harris, MA ;
Hill, DP ;
Issel-Tarver, L ;
Kasarskis, A ;
Lewis, S ;
Matese, JC ;
Richardson, JE ;
Ringwald, M ;
Rubin, GM ;
Sherlock, G .
NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 25 (01) :25-29
[7]   Large clusters of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome [J].
Boutanaev, AM ;
Kalmykova, AI ;
Shevelyov, YY ;
Nurminsky, DI .
NATURE, 2002, 420 (6916) :666-669
[8]  
Campos-Ortega J. A., 1997, The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster, Vsecond
[9]   Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans [J].
Castillo-Davis, CI ;
Hartl, DL .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (05) :728-735
[10]   Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation [J].
Civetta, A ;
Singh, RS .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 15 (07) :901-909