Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process

被引:48
作者
Gibney, Ray [1 ]
Shang, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Katz Grad Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
analytic hierarchy process (AHP); dean selection; academic committee evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.024
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 [计算机应用技术]; 0835 [软件工程];
摘要
This study describes the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the dean selection process. A subcommittee of the dean search task force created an order-ranking based upon group discussions as well as through the application of the AHP. The results of the two processes were compared against the Provost's final decision. Discrepancies were analyzed and explained. The results suggest that root cause of the differences was a variation in emphasis on certain criteria. The authors conclude that AHP is a valuable tool and should be incorporated into personnel selection processes in academia. The AHP provides a convenient and effective tool for evaluating personnel. Fears that it might prove overly complex or difficult for non-technical people to use proved to be unfounded. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1040
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
PROCEDURES FOR SYNTHESIZING RATIO JUDGEMENTS [J].
ACZEL, J ;
SAATY, TL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 27 (01) :93-102
[2]
THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW - A SUMMARY AND REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH [J].
ARVEY, RD ;
CAMPION, JE .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 35 (02) :281-322
[3]
STRUCTURED INTERVIEWING - RAISING THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
PURSELL, ED ;
BROWN, BK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 41 (01) :25-42
[4]
DATTA DK, 2002, HUMAN RESOURCE PLANN, V2, P14
[5]
CRITERION MEASUREMENT AND PERSONNEL JUDGMENTS [J].
GUION, RM .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 14 (02) :141-149
[6]
KAPLAN AS, 2006, PHYS EXECUTIVE, V2, P48
[7]
Saaty TL., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation
[8]
Swiercz P.M., 2001, HUMAN RESOURCE PLANN, V3, P15
[9]
TAYLOR FA, 1998, MANAGEMENT DECISIONS, V9, P679
[10]
VESSA V, 2000, EXECUTIVE SELECTION