Bone remodelation markers are useful in the management of monoclonal gammopathies

被引:14
作者
Hernández, JM
Suquía, B
Queizan, JA
Fisac, RM
Sanchez, JJ
Fernández-Calvo, FJ
García-Sanz, R
Olivier, C
Bárez, A
Calmuntia, MJ
García-Frade, J
Portero, JA
López, R
Aguilera, C
Navajo, JA
San-Miguel, JF
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Segovia, Dept Hematol, Segovia 40002, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Salamanca, Dept Biochem, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Valladolid, Dept Hematol, Valladolid, Spain
[5] Hosp Clin Salamanca, Dept Hematol, Salamanca, Spain
[6] Hosp Ntra Sra Sonsoles, Dept Hematol, Avila, Spain
[7] Hosp Rio Hortega, Dept Hematol, Valladolid, Spain
[8] Hosp Virgen La Concha, Dept Hematol, Zamora, Spain
[9] Hosp Bierzo, Ponferrada, Spain
关键词
myeloma; gammopathies; osteoporosis; bone remodelation; biochemical markers;
D O I
10.1038/sj.thj.6200564
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The evaluation of bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) by conventional radiology has low reproducibility. In the last decade, several serum and urine biochemical parameters, for evaluation of bone turnover, have become available. The present study was designed to explore the value of six bone remodelation markers. It was studied in a series of 176 newly diagnosed patients with monoclonal gammopathies (107 MM and 69 monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance (MGUS)). As control groups we used 25 patients with benign C 9 osteoporosis (130) and 32 healthy individuals (HI). The bone markers analyzed included: bone resorption markers (BRM) (total pyridinoline, total deoxypyridinoline, free deoxypyridinoline and C-terminal telopeptide of collagen 1) and bone formation markers (BFM) (bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP) and osteocalcin (OC). Serum or urinary levels of BRM were significantly higher in MM patients than in MGUS patients, BO patients or HI (P<0.001, respectively). BRM were higher in MM patients with lytic lesions. However, only C-terminal telopeptide discriminated MM patients without bone lesions from MGUS patients. BFM did not show significant differences in the aforementioned comparisons, although a trend toward higher values of OC and lower values of bAP in patients with early bone affectation was observed. Ratios BRM/BFM that contained bAP exhibited differences that were most significant between the MM group and other entities, as well as between the different MM subgroups. In fact, the ratios BRM/bAP provided discrimination between the MM subgroup without lyses and MGUS group (P<0.01). BRM and BFM, especially the ratios, are useful in the evaluation of bone lesions in patients with monoclonal gammopathies.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and solitary plasmacytoma - Implications for progression to overt multiple myeloma [J].
Kyle, RA .
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 11 (01) :71-&
[22]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH ASYMPTOMATIC MULTIPLE-MYELOMA [J].
MOULOPOULOS, LA ;
DIMOPOULOS, MA ;
SMITH, TL ;
WEBER, DM ;
DELASALLE, KB ;
LIBSHITZ, HI ;
ALEXANIAN, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (01) :251-256
[23]   Biochemical bone markers in patients with multiple myeloma [J].
Nawawi, H ;
Samson, D ;
Apperley, J ;
Girgis, S .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1996, 253 (1-2) :61-77
[24]   Bone resorption in multiple myeloma and in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: Quantification by urinary pyridinium cross-links of collagen [J].
Pecherstorfer, M ;
Seibel, MJ ;
Woitge, HW ;
Horn, E ;
Schuster, J ;
Neuda, J ;
Sagaster, P ;
Kohn, H ;
Bayer, P ;
Thiebaud, D ;
Ludwig, H .
BLOOD, 1997, 90 (09) :3743-3750
[25]  
ROBINS SP, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1643
[26]   Initial results in the assessment of multiple myeloma using 18F-FDG PET [J].
Schirrmeister, H ;
Bommer, M ;
Buck, AK ;
Müller, S ;
Messer, P ;
Bunjes, D ;
Döhner, H ;
Bergmann, L ;
Reske, SN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (03) :361-366
[27]   Basic principles and clinical applications of biochemical markers of bone metabolism - Biochemical and technical aspects [J].
Seibel, MJ ;
Woitge, HW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1999, 2 (03) :299-321
[28]  
Woitge HW, 1996, CLIN CHEM, V42, P1796
[29]  
Woitge HW, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P686