International climate regimes: Effects of delayed participation

被引:26
作者
Keppo, Ilkka [1 ]
Rao, Shilpa [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
关键词
climate change; energy modeling; abatement cost; delayed participation;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyses how delayed participation by regions can affect international climate regimes in terms of the feasibility, costs, timing, magnitude and nature of the long-term mitigation response. We use the energy-systems optimization model MESSAGE to construct several climate change mitigation scenarios with various levels of regional participation in short-to-mid term. By comparing these with a global scenario that assumes full spatial and temporal flexibility throughout the century, we are able to evaluate how participatory decisions affect the mitigation response as well as the costs and technology choices. We find that short-term postponement of participation from some regions can often lead to a delay of mitigation measures on the global level. However, if the regional delay lasts until mid-century, participants of the regime are likely to increase their efforts in the short term. Mitigation costs are found to substantially increase as a result of delayed participation-the extent of the increase depends on the relative importance of the region that postpones its participation, the stringency of the climate target and the ability to reorganize mitigation measures. Our analysis also shows that a region's decision to delay its participation in an international climate regime can lead to accumulated inertia in its energy system and thus to a delayed 'technological transition' toward a low-carbon future. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 979
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Thirteen plus one: a comparison of global climate policy architectures
    Aldy, JE
    Barrett, S
    Stavins, RN
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2003, 3 (04) : 373 - 397
  • [2] [Anonymous], DOEEIA04842005
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, International climate efforts beyond 2012: A survey of approaches
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, SPECIAL REPORT EMISS
  • [5] Regional versus global cooperation for climate control
    Asheim, GB
    Froyn, CB
    Hovi, J
    Menz, FC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 51 (01) : 93 - 109
  • [6] Barrett Scott, 2003, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V3, P349, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005767.67689.28, 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005767.67689.28]
  • [7] Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?
    Berk, Marcel M.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2001, 1 (04) : 465 - 480
  • [8] Economic consequences of the US withdrawal from the Kyoto/Bonn Protocol
    Buchner, B
    Carraro, C
    Cersosimo, I
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (04) : 273 - 292
  • [9] Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes
    den Elzen, M
    Lucas, P
    van Vuuren, D
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (16) : 2138 - 2151
  • [10] DENELZEN MGJ, 2005, 728001031 RIVM