A randomized, controlled trial of computerized physiologic trend monitoring in an intensive care unit

Objective: To assess whether the provision of computerized physiologic trend data could improve outcome in newborn infants requiring intensive care. Design: Randomized, controlled trial, with subsidiary questionnaire studies. Setting: Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit with 12 intensive care cots. Patients: All infants admitted between January 1991 and September 1993 who were less than or equal to 32 wks gestation or >32 wks gestation, and ventilated for >4 hrs or asphyxiated. Interventions: Randomization to one of four groups for first 7 days of life: A) no display of trend data; B) continuous display of trend data; C1) alternating 24-hr display of trend data, starting with display in first 24 hrs; and C2) alternating 24-hr display of trend data, starting with no display in first 24 hrs. Measurements and Main Results: The short term effects of monitoring on patient outcome was judged by volume of colloid given, number of blood gases taken, and by measurement taken from cranial Doppler ultrasound. Medium-term measures included time ventilated, time given supplemental oxygen, death, time to death or discharge, and cranial ultrasound at discharge. Long-term outcome was assessed by neurodevelopmental status at age 1 to 4 yrs of age. Staff and parent questionnaires assessed their respective attitudes to the introduction of this technology. None of the patient outcome measures, short, medium-, or long-term, demonstrated any significant benefit from the provision of computerized physiologic trend monitoring. Staff questionnaires demonstrated an acceptance of the system and an improved understanding of neonatal physiology as a result of computerized physiologic trends. Parent questionnaires demonstrated increased anxiety caused by the system in 11% of parents, although only 1% of parents continued to have concerns if the system were able to help their child. Conclusions: A randomized, controlled trial was unable to demonstrate any benefit to patients resulting from the introduction of a computerized physiologic trend monitoring system. Benefits of the system have been recognized, however, in subsidiary studies, staff education, and research studies.