Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002

被引:326
作者
Horstmann, E
McCabe, MS
Grochow, L
Yamamoto, S
Rubinstein, L
Budd, T
Shoemaker, D
Emanuel, EJ
Grady, C
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Clin Bioeth, Warren G Magnuson Clin Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] NCI, Canc Therapy Evaluat Program, NIH, Rockville, MD USA
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Res Ctr Canc Prevent & Screening, Tokyo 104, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa042220
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Previous reviews of phase 1 oncology trials reported a rate of response to treatment of 4 to 6 percent and a toxicity-related death rate of 0.5 percent. These results may not reflect the rates in current phase 1 oncology trials. METHODS We reviewed all nonpediatric phase 1 oncology trials sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute between 1991 and 2002. We report the rates of response to treatment, of stable disease, of grade 4 toxic events, and of treatment-related deaths. RESULTS We analyzed 460 trials involving 11,935 participants, all of whom were assessed for toxicity and 10,402 of whom were assessed for a response to therapy. The overall response rate (i.e., for both complete and partial responses) was 10.6 percent, with considerable variation among trials. ``Classic'' phase 1 trials of single investigational chemotherapeutic agents represented only 20 percent of the trials and had a response rate of 4.4 percent. Studies that included at least one anticancer agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration constituted 46.3 percent of the trials and had a response rate of 17.8. An additional 34.1 percent of participants had stable disease or a less-than-partial response. The overall rate of death due to toxic events was 0.49 percent. Of 3465 participants for whom data on patient-specific grade 4 toxic events were available, 14.3 percent had had at least one episode of grade 4 toxic events. CONCLUSIONS Overall response rates among phase 1 oncology trials are higher than previously reported, although they have not changed for classic phase 1 trials, and toxicity-related death rates have remained stable. Rates of response and toxicity vary, however, among the various types of phase 1 oncology trials.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 904
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies - Reexamining the arguments and data [J].
Agrawal, M ;
Emanuel, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (08) :1075-1082
[2]  
Annas G J, 1992, Health Matrix Clevel, V2, P119
[3]  
Ansher SS, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V949, P333
[4]   Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for toxicity and survival for patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials [J].
Bachelot, T ;
Ray-Coquard, I ;
Catimel, G ;
Ardiet, C ;
Guastalla, JP ;
Dumortier, A ;
Chauvin, F ;
Droz, JP ;
Philip, T ;
Clavel, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (02) :151-156
[5]  
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, 1999, Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0
[6]   Risks and benefits of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating new anticancer agents - A case for more innovation [J].
Chen, EX ;
Tannock, IF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (17) :2150-2151
[7]   Learning from our patients: One participant's impact on clinical trial research and informed consent [J].
Daugherty, CK ;
Siegler, M ;
Ratain, MJ ;
Zimmer, G .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (11) :892-897
[8]   RESPONSES AND TOXIC DEATHS IN PHASE-I CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DECOSTER, G ;
STEIN, G ;
HOLDENER, EE .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1990, 1 (03) :175-181
[9]  
Dent SF, 1996, ANN ONCOL, V7, P561
[10]   Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development [J].
Eisenhauer, EA ;
O'Dwyer, PJ ;
Christian, M ;
Humphrey, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :684-692