Accuracy of field alignment in abdominal radiation therapy

被引:6
作者
Kortmann, RD
Hess, CF
Meisner, C
Schmidberger, H
Bamberg, M
机构
[1] UNIV TUBINGEN, DEPT RADIOTHERAPY, D-72076 TUBINGEN, GERMANY
[2] UNIV TUBINGEN, INST MED INFORMAT PROC, D-72076 TUBINGEN, GERMANY
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1996年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
radiation therapy; quality assurance; verification films; patient positioning; seminoma;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(96)00152-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of field alignment in a homogeneous group of patients undergoing radiotherapy of the abdomen (adjuvant treatment of the paraaortic region in Stage I testicular seminoma), To evaluate the predictive value of the first verification on field placement errors during subsequent treatment delivery, Methods acid Materials: In 45 patients, linear and rotational discrepancies were measured between simulation and first check and between 10 consecutive verification films, Results: For the total group of patients, the distribution of all deviations showed mean values between 2.3 mm and -2.7 mm with standard deviations of 3.9 mm to 4.7 mm for linear discrepancies, and -0.5 degrees to 0.3 degrees with standard deviations of 1.2 degrees to 2.1 degrees for rotational discrepancies, respectively. For ail patients, deviations for the transition from simulator to the treatment machine were similar to deviations during subsequent treatment delivery, with 95% of all absolute deviations < 10.0 mm and 4 degrees, respectively, When performing correlation analysis between deviations at first check and during treatment delivery, a correlation for lateral displacements and a borderline correlation for caudal displacements could be found, There was no correlation for cranial and rotational displacements, Conclusions: Although a trend of deviations for subsequent treatment delivery may be shown at first check, our analysis indicates that the first verification cannot reliably predict inaccuracies during treatment delivery, Random fluctuations of field displacements of up to 1.0 cm prevail, They must be considered when prescribing the safety margins of the planned target volume and determining cutoff points for corrective actions in abdominal radiation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 783
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   IS IT NECESSARY TO REPEAT QUALITY-CONTROL PROCEDURES FOR HEAD AND NECK PATIENTS [J].
MITINE, C ;
LEUNENS, G ;
VERSTRAETE, J ;
BLANCKAERT, N ;
VANDAM, J ;
DUTREIX, A ;
VANDERSCHUEREN, E .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1991, 21 (03) :201-210
[12]   ACCURACY OF RADIATION-FIELD ALIGNMENT IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE [J].
RABINOWITZ, I ;
BROOMBERG, J ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MCCARTHY, K ;
LEONG, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (10) :1857-1867
[13]   IMPROVED METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF VARIABILITY IN PATIENT POSITIONING FOR RADIATION-THERAPY USING SIMULATION AND SERIAL PORTAL FILM MEASUREMENTS [J].
ROSENTHAL, SA ;
GALVIN, JM ;
GOLDWEIN, JW ;
SMITH, AR ;
BLITZER, PH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 23 (03) :621-625
[14]  
SNEDECOR GW, 1956, STATISTICAL METHODS, P190
[15]   IMPACT OF INITIAL QUALITY-CONTROL REVIEW ON STUDY OUTCOME IN LUNG AND HEAD NECK-CANCER STUDIES - REVIEW OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP EXPERIENCE [J].
WALLNER, PE ;
LUSTIG, RA ;
PAJAK, TF ;
ROBINSON, G ;
DAVIS, LW ;
PEREZ, CA ;
SEYDEL, HG ;
MARCIAL, VA ;
LARAMORE, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (04) :893-900