The epidemiological and economic impact of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (6/11/16/18) in the UK

被引:66
作者
Dasbach, E. J. [1 ]
Insinga, R. P. [1 ]
Elbasha, E. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck Res Labs, Hlth Econ Stat, Biostat & Res Decis Sci, N Wales, PA 19454 USA
关键词
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; cost-effectiveness analysis; economics; epidemiology; human papillomavirus; uterine cervical neoplasms; vaccines;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01743.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the potential epidemiological and economic impact of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) (6/11/16/18) vaccine for preventing cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN2/3), CIN1 and genital warts. Design Cost-utility analysis. Setting UK. Population Female and male UK population 12 years or older. Methods We adapted a previously developed multi-HPV type dynamic transmission to compare four female vaccination strategies, routine vaccination at age 12 years, and routine vaccination at age 12 years combined with temporary catch-up vaccination at ages 12-14, 12-17 and 12-24 years. Main outcomes measures Costs, cases avoided, incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Results The model projected that at year 100, each vaccination strategy could reduce the number of HPV 6/11/16/18-related cervical cancer, CIN2/3, CIN1 and genital wart cases among women by 86, 85, 79 and 89% respectively. Over 25 years, routine vaccination at age 12 years combined with a 12- to 24-year-old catch-up programme was the most effective strategy, reducing the cumulative number of cases of cervical cancer, CIN2/3, CIN1 and genital warts by 5800, 146 000, 28 000, and 1.1 million respectively. Over 100 years, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios across all strategies ranged from 5882 pound to 11,412 pound per QALY gained. Conclusion In the UK, a quadrivalent HPV vaccination programme that includes a catch-up strategy can reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, CIN and genital warts at a cost per QALY ratio within the range typically regarded as cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 956
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine [J].
Barr, Eliav ;
Tamms, Gretchen .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 45 (05) :609-617
[2]  
Bramley J C, 2002, Commun Dis Public Health, V5, P318
[3]   Economic evaluation of vaccination programs: The impact of herd-immunity [J].
Brisson, M ;
Edmunds, WJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (01) :76-82
[4]  
CHESSON H, 2006, POTENTIAL COST EFFEC
[5]  
*CTR EV VAL RISK H, 2006, COST EFF AN REG
[6]   Mathematical models for predicting the epidemiologic and economic impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease [J].
Dasbach, Erik J. ;
Elbasha, Elarnin H. ;
Insinga, Ralph P. .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2006, 28 :88-100
[7]  
*DEP HLTH NAT, 2007, HPV VACC REC NHS IMM
[8]   Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis [J].
Devlin, N ;
Parkin, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (05) :437-452
[9]  
Edmunds WJ, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P3263, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991215)18:23&lt
[10]  
3263::AID-SIM315&gt