Bringing Ecosystem Services into the Real World: An Operational Framework for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Losing Wild Nature

被引:106
作者
Balmford, Andrew [5 ,6 ]
Fisher, Brendan [1 ]
Green, Rhys E. [2 ,5 ]
Naidoo, Robin [3 ]
Strassburg, Bernardo [6 ]
Turner, R. Kerry [6 ]
Rodrigues, Ana S. L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Sandy G19 2DL, Beds, England
[3] World Wildlife Fund, Conservat Sci Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[4] CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, UMR5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[6] Univ E Anglia, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Ecosystem modeling; Benefits; Millennium ecosystem assessment; Scenarios; Conservation; Development; CONTINGENT VALUATION; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-010-9413-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Policy action to halt the global loss of biodiversity and ecosystems is hindered by the perception that it would be so costly as to compromise economic development, yet this assumption needs testing. Inspired by the recent Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, the leaders of the G8+5 nations commissioned a similar assessment of the economics of losing biodiversity, under the Potsdam Initiative on Biodiversity. Here, we propose a conceptual framework for such a global assessment which emphasizes several critical insights from the environmental economics and valuation literature: contrasting counterfactual scenarios which differ solely in whether they include specific conservation policies; identifying non-overlapping benefits; modeling the production, flow, use and value of benefits in a spatially-explicit way; and incorporating the likely costs as well as possible benefits of policy interventions. Tackling these challenges, we argue, will significantly enhance our ability to quantify how the loss of benefits derived from ecosystems and biodiversity compares with the costs incurred in retaining them. We also summarise a review of the current state of knowledge, in order to assess how quickly this framework could be operationalized for some key ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
  • [2] [Anonymous], ECOSYSTEM BASED GLOB
  • [3] Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature
    Balmford, A
    Bruner, A
    Cooper, P
    Costanza, R
    Farber, S
    Green, RE
    Jenkins, M
    Jefferiss, P
    Jessamy, V
    Madden, J
    Munro, K
    Myers, N
    Naeem, S
    Paavola, J
    Rayment, M
    Rosendo, S
    Roughgarden, J
    Trumper, K
    Turner, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 950 - 953
  • [4] BALMFORD A, 2008, EC BIODIVERSITY ECOY
  • [5] A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences
    Bateman, I
    Munro, A
    Rhodes, B
    Starmer, C
    Sugden, R
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 479 - 505
  • [6] Decoy effects in choice experiments and contingent valuation: Asymmetric dominance
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Munro, Alistair
    Poe, Gregory L.
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2008, 84 (01) : 115 - 127
  • [7] Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Atkinson, Giles
    Turner, Kerry
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) : 177 - 218
  • [8] Biggs R, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
  • [9] On measuring economic values for nature
    Bockstael, NE
    Freeman, AM
    Kopp, RJ
    Portney, PR
    Smith, VK
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) : 1384 - 1389
  • [10] What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
    Boyd, James
    Banzhaf, Spencer
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) : 616 - 626