Bringing Ecosystem Services into the Real World: An Operational Framework for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Losing Wild Nature

被引:106
作者
Balmford, Andrew [5 ,6 ]
Fisher, Brendan [1 ]
Green, Rhys E. [2 ,5 ]
Naidoo, Robin [3 ]
Strassburg, Bernardo [6 ]
Turner, R. Kerry [6 ]
Rodrigues, Ana S. L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Sandy G19 2DL, Beds, England
[3] World Wildlife Fund, Conservat Sci Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[4] CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, UMR5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[6] Univ E Anglia, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Ecosystem modeling; Benefits; Millennium ecosystem assessment; Scenarios; Conservation; Development; CONTINGENT VALUATION; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-010-9413-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Policy action to halt the global loss of biodiversity and ecosystems is hindered by the perception that it would be so costly as to compromise economic development, yet this assumption needs testing. Inspired by the recent Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, the leaders of the G8+5 nations commissioned a similar assessment of the economics of losing biodiversity, under the Potsdam Initiative on Biodiversity. Here, we propose a conceptual framework for such a global assessment which emphasizes several critical insights from the environmental economics and valuation literature: contrasting counterfactual scenarios which differ solely in whether they include specific conservation policies; identifying non-overlapping benefits; modeling the production, flow, use and value of benefits in a spatially-explicit way; and incorporating the likely costs as well as possible benefits of policy interventions. Tackling these challenges, we argue, will significantly enhance our ability to quantify how the loss of benefits derived from ecosystems and biodiversity compares with the costs incurred in retaining them. We also summarise a review of the current state of knowledge, in order to assess how quickly this framework could be operationalized for some key ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation
    Kindermann, Georg
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Sohngen, Brent
    Sathaye, Jayant
    Andrasko, Kenneth
    Rametsteiner, Ewald
    Schlamadinger, Bernhard
    Wunder, Sven
    Beach, Robert
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (30) : 10302 - 10307
  • [22] Kok K, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
  • [23] Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of conservation: The UK Biodiversity Action Plan
    Laycock, Helen
    Moran, Dominic
    Smart, James
    Raffaelli, David
    White, Piran
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (12) : 3120 - 3127
  • [24] Contingent valuation: Environmental polling or preference engine?
    MacMillan, Douglas
    Hanley, Nick
    Lienhoop, Nele
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (01) : 299 - 307
  • [25] Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Global land-use implications
    Miles, Lera
    Kapos, Valerie
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) : 1454 - 1455
  • [26] Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: Implications for conservation priorities
    Naidoo, Robin
    Iwamura, Takuya
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 140 (1-2) : 40 - 49
  • [27] Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation
    Naidoo, Robin
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) : 2153 - 2164
  • [28] Next, the value of God, and other reactions
    Norgaard, RB
    Bode, C
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 25 (01) : 37 - 39
  • [29] Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: An application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon
    Polasky, S
    Camm, JD
    Garber-Yonts, B
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2001, 77 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [30] Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns
    Polasky, Stephen
    Nelson, Erik
    Camm, Jeff
    Csuti, Blair
    Fackler, Paul
    Lonsdorf, Eric
    Montgomery, Claire
    White, Denis
    Arthur, Jeff
    Garber-Yonts, Brian
    Haight, Robert
    Kagan, Jimmy
    Starfield, Anthony
    Tobalske, Claudine
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (06) : 1505 - 1524