The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) data collection process for nodule detection and annotation

被引:168
作者
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. [1 ]
Armato, Samuel G., III [2 ]
Meyer, Charles R. [3 ]
Reeves, Anthony P. [4 ]
McLennan, Geoffrey [5 ]
Pais, Richie C. [1 ]
Freymann, John [5 ,6 ]
Brown, Matthew S. [1 ]
Engelmann, Roger M. [2 ]
Bland, Peyton H. [3 ]
Laderach, Gary E. [3 ]
Piker, Chris [7 ]
Guo, Junfeng [7 ]
Towfic, Zaid [7 ]
Qing, David P. -Y. [1 ]
Yankelevitz, David F. [8 ]
Aberle, Denise R. [1 ]
van Beek, Edwin J. R. [7 ]
MacMahon, Heber [2 ]
Kazerooni, Ella A. [2 ]
Croft, Barbara Y. [9 ]
Clarke, Laurence P. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffenm Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[6] SAIC Frederick Inc, Frederick, MD USA
[7] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[8] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[9] NCI, Canc Imaging Program, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
lung cancer; lung nodules; CT imaging; database; computer-aided diagnosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The Lung linage Database Consortium (LIDC) is developing a publicly available database of thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans as a medical imaging research resource to promote the development of computer-aided detection or characterization of pulmonary nodules. To obtain the best estimate of the location and spatial extent of lung nodules, expert thoracic radiologists reviewed and annotated each scan. Because a consensus panel approach was neither feasible nor desirable, a unique two-phase, multicenter data collection process was developed to allow multiple radiologists at different centers to asynchronously review and annotate each CT scan. This data collection process was also intended to capture the variability among readers. Materials and Methods. Four radiologists reviewed each scan using the following process. In the first or "blinded" phase, each radiologist reviewed the CT scan independently. In the second or "unblinded" review phase, results from all four blinded reviews were compiled and presented to each radiologist for a second review, allowing the radiologists to review their own annotations together with the annotations of the other radiologists. The results of each radiologist's unblinded review were compiled to form the final unblinded review. An XML-based message system was developed to communicate the results of each reading. Results. This two-phase data collection process was designed, tested, and implemented across the LIDC. More than 500 CT scans have been read and annotated using this method by four expert readers; these scans either are currently publicly available at http://ncia.nci.nih.gov or will be in the near future. Conclusions. A unique data collection process was developed, tested, and implemented that allowed multiple readers at distributed sites to asynchronously review CT scans multiple times. This process captured the opinions of each reader regarding the location and spatial extent of lung nodules.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1474
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Lung image database consortium: Developing a resource for the medical imaging research community [J].
Armato, SG ;
McLennan, G ;
McNitt-Gray, MF ;
Meyer, CR ;
Yankelevitz, D ;
Aberle, DR ;
Henschke, CI ;
Hoffman, EA ;
Kazerooni, EA ;
MacMahon, H ;
Reeves, AP ;
Croft, BY ;
Clarke, LP .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :739-748
[2]
National Cancer Institute Initiative: Lung image database resource for imaging research [J].
Clarke, LP ;
Croft, BY ;
Staab, E ;
Baker, H ;
Sullivan, DC .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2001, 8 (05) :447-450
[3]
Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: Contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium [J].
Dodd, LE ;
Wagner, RF ;
Armato, SG ;
McNitt-Gray, MF ;
Beiden, S ;
Chan, HP ;
Gur, D ;
McLennan, G ;
Metz, CE ;
Petrick, N ;
Sahiner, B ;
Sayre, J .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (04) :462-475
[4]
Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response [J].
Erasmus, JJ ;
Gladish, GW ;
Broemeling, L ;
Sabloff, BS ;
Truong, MT ;
Herbst, RS ;
Munden, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2574-2582
[5]
Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements [J].
Goodman, LR ;
Gulsun, M ;
Washington, L ;
Nagy, PG ;
Piacsek, KL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (04) :989-994
[6]
Henschke CI, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P1763, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa060476
[7]
IMPROVING DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY - COMPARISON OF INTERACTIVE AND DELPHI CONSULTATIONS [J].
HILLMAN, BJ ;
HESSEL, SJ ;
SWENSSON, RG ;
HERMAN, PG .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1977, 12 (02) :112-115
[8]
Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in CT tumor measurements [J].
Hopper, KD ;
Kasales, CJ ;
VanSlyke, MA ;
Schwartz, TA ;
TenHave, TR ;
Jozefiak, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (04) :851-854
[9]
Judy PF, 2002, RADIOLOGY, V225, P497
[10]
Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: Agreement among radiologists [J].
Leader, JK ;
Warfel, TE ;
Fuhrman, CR ;
Golla, SK ;
Weissfeld, JL ;
Avila, RS ;
Turner, WD ;
Zheng, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (04) :973-978