Characteristic scores and scales -: A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation

被引:72
作者
Glaenzel, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, IRPS, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
citation analysis; long-term citation impact; disciplinary citation impact; pareto distribution; extreme values; truncated moments;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2006.10.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In an earlier paper by Glanzel and Schubert [Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988a). Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123-127; Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988b). Theoretical and empirical studies of the tail of scientometric distributions. In L. Egghe, & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics: Vols. 87/88, (pp. 75-83). Elsevier Science Publisher B. V.], a method for classifying ranked observations into self-adjusting categories was developed. This parameter-free method, which was called method of characteristic scores and scales, is independent of any particular bibliometric law. The objective of the present study is twofold. In the theoretical part, the analysis of its properties for the general form of the Pareto distribution will be extended and deepened; in the empirical part the citation history of individual scientific disciplines will be studied. The chosen citation window of 21 years makes it possible to analyse dynamic aspects of the method, and proves sufficiently large to also obtain stable patterns for each of the disciplines. The theoretical findings are supplemented by regularities derived from the long-term observations. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 102
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   ON SOME STOPPING-TIMES OF CITATION PROCESSES - FROM THEORY TO INDICATORS [J].
GLANZEL, W .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1992, 28 (01) :53-60
[12]   A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY ON AGING AND RECEPTION PROCESSES OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE [J].
GLANZEL, W ;
SCHOEPFLIN, U .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1995, 21 (01) :37-53
[13]  
Glänzel W, 2004, SCIENTIST, V18, P8
[14]   Better late than never?: On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Schlemmer, B ;
Thijs, B .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 58 (03) :571-586
[15]   Journal impact measures in bibliometric research [J].
Glanzel, W ;
Moed, HF .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) :171-193
[16]   A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 56 (03) :357-367
[17]   CHARACTERIZATION BY TRUNCATED MOMENTS AND ITS APPLICATION TO PEARSON-TYPE DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
GLANZEL, W ;
TELCS, A ;
SCHUBERT, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WAHRSCHEINLICHKEITSTHEORIE UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE, 1984, 66 (02) :173-183
[18]   PREDICTIVE ASPECTS OF A STOCHASTIC-MODEL FOR CITATION PROCESSES [J].
GLANZEL, W ;
SCHUBERT, A .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 31 (01) :69-80
[19]   CHARACTERISTIC SCORES AND SCALES IN ASSESSING CITATION IMPACT [J].
GLANZEL, W ;
SCHUBERT, A .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1988, 14 (02) :123-127
[20]   A STOCHASTIC-MODEL FOR THE AGING OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE [J].
GLANZEL, W ;
SCHOEPFLIN, U .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1994, 30 (01) :49-64